- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 23:05:40 -0600
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- Cc: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@bio.ri.ccf.org>, public-grddl-wg Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 20:34 -0500, Harry Halpin wrote: > While GRDDL is seen as a "lightweight" (i.e. should be easy to read and > implement) spec, a bit of formality can be useful. > > I agree with DanC's idea to put the N3 Rules out in a separate file, umm... I'm thinking about moving the appendix (that explains the built-ins used in the rules) to a separate file, but not the rules themselves. I need the rules right next to the prose for maintenance reasons. > and > so make the spec look a bit less scary to people that don't know N3 > Rules - but they would still be useful to implementers that know or are > interested in N3 rules. > > I think Dan's normative formal semantics as given by his text is good > though, and I would prefer personally if it stayed in the spec. > > -harry -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 7 February 2007 05:05:43 UTC