- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 12:13:40 -0600
- To: "McBride, Brian" <brian.mcbride@hp.com>
- Cc: public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 17:34 +0000, McBride, Brian wrote: > I have added a test case > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/testlist2#multipleRepresentations Nifty... I notice "This document, while well-formed and using the HTML vocabulary consistent with the HTML 2, 3.2, and 4 standards, bears no DTD and is not a strictly conforming XHTML document." And indeed, the question of which HTML specs to cite is tricky. I chose REC-xhtml-modularization-20010410 for http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#XHTML There we find... "A conforming XHTML family document is a valid instance of an XHTML Host Language Conforming Document Type." Oh. Hmm... that still requires a DTD. Well, I guess that's consistent with the GRDDL spec: "To accomodate the DTD-based syntax of XHTML[XHTML], which precludes using attributes from foreign namespaces ..." I think there's a name for the sort of document that multipleRepresentations.html is... I think it's in the XHTML 1 spec. Well, it's discussed in 3.1.2. Using XHTML with other namespaces http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#well-formed but I guess it's not given a name. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 9 February 2007 18:13:45 UTC