- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 19:23:11 -0600
- To: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
OK, it just crossed my radar for the 2nd time; 1st on slashdot, now planetrdf: Metalink unifies Internet downloads http://www.geospatialsemanticweb.com/2007/02/25/metalink-unifies-internet-downloads -> http://www.metalinker.org/ reminds me of CDF and the push workshop, one of the original use cases for RDF. GRDDL anyone? [[ Frameworks and Applications W3C has taken a "framework" approach to things like channels, packages and such. We had the CDF submission in March '97, OSD and DRP in Aug '97. We held a Sep '97 push workshop and ended up pursuing RDF, a general framework for resource description and metadata, rather than particular vocabularies. The idea behind this sort of generalized approach is that it adds just a little cost/complexity to each of the applications, but in return, each application is part of a richer whole. Convincing the developers of the first few applications when they can't see the benefits is a challenge. (See also: the HTTP extension framework [@@link], XML namespaces, etc.) But imagine what the Web would be like if you needed a different client for search services, online documentation, community forums, and online banking. Actually, you don't have to imagine, you can probably just remember: you have used pre-web online information services, haven't you? ;-) ]] -- http://www.w3.org/2000/08/w3c-synd/#Frameworks -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 27 February 2007 01:23:22 UTC