W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > February 2007

HTTP Header Precedence

From: Ian Davis <Ian.Davis@talis.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 09:45:12 -0000
Message-ID: <DD5E887552496241BC701548837A282F05331FD1@nemo.talis.local>
To: <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>

I couldn't see this in the GRDDL spec, but I've looked so hard perhaps
I'm blind to it. My assumption is that a client is licensed to apply all
or none of the GRDDL transformations it can discover. This has to be
true because there may be transformation procedures that a given client
is not capable of performing, e.g. javascript.

So the HTTP header is just another transformation that may or may not be
performed by the client. However if the header is present the client
should make an attempt to process it in the same way it would if the
transformation were in a link element or the namespace document.

Is this correct?

The very latest from Talis
read the latest news at www.talis.com/news 
listen to our podcasts www.talis.com/podcasts 
see us at these events www.talis.com/events 
join the discussion here www.talis.com/forums 
join our developer community www.talis.com/tdn 
and read our blogs www.talis.com/blogs

Any views or personal opinions expressed within this email may not be those of Talis Information Ltd. The content of this email message and any files that may be attached are confidential, and for the usage of the intended recipient only. If you are not the intended recipient, then please return this message to the sender and delete it. Any use of this e-mail by an unauthorised recipient is prohibited.
Talis Information Ltd is a member of the Talis Group of companies and is registered in England No 3638278 with its registered office at Knights Court, Solihull Parkway, Birmingham Business Park, B37 7YB.
Received on Tuesday, 6 February 2007 09:45:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:52:35 UTC