Saturday, 30 April 2016
Friday, 29 April 2016
- Re: Call about real-time access
- Re: Call about real-time access
- Re: Call about real-time access
- Re: Call about real-time access
- Re: Which URI should we use in our examples?
- Re: Call about real-time access
- Re: dwbp-ACTION-277: Change all the phrases of intedend outcomes to present. e.g. consumers will know that data that is referred to from the current dataset is unavailable or only available under different conditions.
- Re: [Minutes] 2016-04-29
- Call about real-time access
- Re: [Minutes] 2016-04-29
- Re: [Minutes] 2016-04-29
- [Minutes] 2016-04-29
- Re: Which URI should we use in our examples?
- dwbp-ACTION-277: Change all the phrases of intedend outcomes to present. e.g. consumers will know that data that is referred to from the current dataset is unavailable or only available under different conditions.
- dwbp-ACTION-276: Enhance the examples and incorporate some of the things we discussed today
- dwbp-ACTION-275: Help with the example of bp http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#documentyourapi
- Re: Please check the updates we did on BP document
- Re: Imperative sub titles
- Re: Imperative sub titles
- Re: Imperative sub titles
- Re: Please check the updates we did on BP document
- Re: Please check the updates we did on BP document
- Re: Please check the updates we did on BP document
Thursday, 28 April 2016
- Please check the updates we did on BP document
- For tracking - mails and issues related to ACTION-263
- Re: Revised wording for Choose the right formalization level
- Re: Help with Data Preservation BP
- Re: Revised wording for Choose the right formalization level
- Re: Revised wording for Choose the right formalization level
- Agenda for tomorrow
- Minor changes for your consideration
- Re: Revised wording for Choose the right formalization level
- Re: Introduction text
- Re: How to Test Persistent URI BP
Wednesday, 27 April 2016
- Re: How to Test Persistent URI BP
- Re: Introduction text
- Re: Revised wording for Choose the right formalization level
- Re: That restriction lifting example
- Re: That restriction lifting example
- Introduction text
- How to Test Persistent URI BP
- Re: Which URI should we use in our examples?
- Re: That restriction lifting example
- Revised wording for Choose the right formalization level
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-253: Use standardized terms x Reuse vocabularies [Best practices document(s)]
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-253: Use standardized terms x Reuse vocabularies [Best practices document(s)]
- Help with Best Practice 22: Provide data up to date
- That restriction lifting example
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-253: Use standardized terms x Reuse vocabularies [Best practices document(s)]
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-253: Use standardized terms x Reuse vocabularies [Best practices document(s)]
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-253: Use standardized terms x Reuse vocabularies [Best practices document(s)]
Tuesday, 26 April 2016
- Re: Proposals for Annette's comments to be considered before publishing the last working draft
- Re: Proposals for Annette's comments to be considered before publishing the last working draft
- Re: Which URI should we use in our examples?
- Help with Data Preservation BP
- Re: Proposals for Annette's comments to be considered before publishing the last working draft
- Which URI should we use in our examples?
- Proposals for Annette's comments to be considered before publishing the last working draft
Monday, 25 April 2016
Saturday, 23 April 2016
Friday, 22 April 2016
- Re: partial review
- Re: [DWBP] Help with grammar of the Intended Outcomes
- [DWB] Help with grammar of the Intended Outcomes
- [Minutes] 2016-04-22
- dwbp-ACTION-274: Provide imperative subtitles for bps 20-37
- dwbp-ACTION-273: Provide imperative subtitles for bps 1-19
Thursday, 21 April 2016
- Re: BP13 tiny change
- Re: partial review
- Re: partial review
- BP13 tiny change
- Re: some observations about the front matter
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow's meeting
- Re: rest of review of BP doc
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow's meeting
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow's meeting
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow's meeting
- Agenda for tomorrow's meeting
- Re: Comments on the 9 April version of the BP doc
- Re: Comments on the 9 April version of the BP doc
- Re: Comments on the 9 April version of the BP doc
- Re: vocabs and issue 166
- Re: rest of review of BP doc
- rest of review of BP doc
Wednesday, 20 April 2016
- References to precision and accuracy example
- Re: DWBP - Best Practices - Review
- Few Observations on DWBP BP document
- Re: Sanity check
Tuesday, 19 April 2016
- Re: I'm done (for now)
- I'm done (for now)
- Turtle validated
- Re: some observations about the front matter
- More Comments on the 9 April version of the BP doc
- Re: partial review
- Re: vocabs and issue 166
- Re: DWBP - Best Practices - Review
- Re: DWBP - Best Practices - Review
- Re: Native speaker review complete
- Comments to be considered before publishing the last working draft
Monday, 18 April 2016
- Re: DWBP - Best Practices - Review
- Re: DWBP - Best Practices - Review
- Re: partial review
- Re: DWBP - Best Practices - Review
- DWBP - Best Practices - Review
- Native speaker review complete
Saturday, 16 April 2016
- Re: partial review
- Re: Comments on the 9 April version of the BP doc
- Re: some observations about the front matter
- Re: vocabs and issue 166
- vocabs and issue 166
Friday, 15 April 2016
- Re: W3C Data Usage Vocabulary poster at FORCE 2016.
- W3C Data Usage Vocabulary poster at FORCE 2016.
- [Minutes] 2016-04-15
- ** new agenda on the fly **
- Re: Memento example in BP doc
- Re: Memento example in BP doc
- Memento example in BP doc
- Comments on the 9 April version of the BP doc
- Intense reviewing/impact on schedule
- Re: described-by?
- partial review
Thursday, 14 April 2016
- Re: Native speaker review, partial
- some observations about the front matter
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow (15/04/2016)
- Re: described-by?
- Native speaker review, partial
- described-by?
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow (15/04/2016)
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow (15/04/2016)
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow (15/04/2016)
- A line on fragment IDs
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow (15/04/2016)
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow (15/04/2016)
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow (15/04/2016)
- Agenda for tomorrow (15/04/2016)
- Re: dwbp-ACTION-255: Create an example using prov:wasderivedfrom in the dqv, close issue-222
- Re: dwbp-ACTION-255: Create an example using prov:wasderivedfrom in the dqv, close issue-222
- Re: dwbp-ACTION-255: Create an example using prov:wasderivedfrom in the dqv, close issue-222
- Re: Help to writing an example for the Best Practice 16: Reuse vocabularies
- Re: DQV, ISO 19115/19157 and GeoDCAT-AP - Issue-202 - representing conformance
Wednesday, 13 April 2016
Tuesday, 12 April 2016
Monday, 11 April 2016
- Some mechanical updates to the BP doc
- Re: Complete? (was Re: Challenges diagram)
- Re: Complete? (was Re: Challenges diagram)
- Re: Complete? (was Re: Challenges diagram)
- Complete? (was Re: Challenges diagram)
Saturday, 9 April 2016
- Re: DQV, ISO 19115/19157 and GeoDCAT-AP - Issue-202 - representing conformance
- Challenges diagram
- Re: [dwbp] Freezing the document
- [dwbp] Freezing the document
Friday, 8 April 2016
- Re: Comments and questions about Data Access BP
- Re: Feedback about examples
- Re: Feedback and about intended outcomes of Data Vocabularies BP
- Re: Comments and questions about Data Access BP
- [minutes] 2016-04-08
- Re: Feedback and about intended outcomes of Data Vocabularies BP
- Re: Feedback and about intended outcomes of Data Vocabularies BP
- dwbp-ACTION-272: Redo the challenges diagram
- Re: Feedback and about intended outcomes of Data Vocabularies BP
- Fwd: Re: Persistent URIs for Dimensions and Categories cited in DQV
- Re: Feedback and about intended outcomes of Data Vocabularies BP
- Re: DQV, ISO 19115/19157 and GeoDCAT-AP - Issue-202 - representing conformance
- Feedback and about intended outcomes of Data Vocabularies BP
- Re: Comments and questions about Data Access BP
- Re: Feedback about examples
Thursday, 7 April 2016
- Re: Check if the example of Best Practice 37: Cite the Original Publication is correct
- Re: Fill in the blanks in 'Use Cases Requirements x Best Practices table' https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/247
- Re: Persistent URIs for Dimensions and Categories cited in DQV
- Re: Updating the example of Best Practice 14: Provide data in multiple formats
- Re: Persistent URIs for Dimensions and Categories cited in DQV
- Out of Office
- dwbp-ISSUE-253: Use standardized terms x Reuse vocabularies [Best practices document(s)]
- Out of Office
- dwbp-ISSUE-252: Should we use Data Reuse or Data Usage as the title of Section 8.15
- Re: some comments on the DWBP draft
- Agenda for tomorrow's call: Vocabs!
- Re: Freezing the Best Practices text this week
Wednesday, 6 April 2016
- Re: dwbp-ACTION-267: Attempt to merge the bps on api documetnation
- Re: Check if the example of Best Practice 37: Cite the Original Publication is correct
- Re: dwbp-ACTION-267: Attempt to merge the bps on api documetnation
- Re: Check if the example of Best Practice 37: Cite the Original Publication is correct
- Re: Comments and questions about Data Access BP
- Re: Fill in the blanks in 'Use Cases Requirements x Best Practices table' https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/247
- dwbp-ACTION-267: Attempt to merge the bps on api documetnation
- Re: Check if the example of Best Practice 37: Cite the Original Publication is correct
- Re: Check if the example of Best Practice 37: Cite the Original Publication is correct
- Check if the example of Best Practice 37: Cite the Original Publication is correct
- Help to writing an example for the Best Practice 16: Reuse vocabularies
- Updating the example of Best Practice 14: Provide data in multiple formats
- Updating the example of Best Practice 12: Assign URIs to dataset versions and series
- Updating the examples of Versioning BPs
- Re: Freezing the Best Practices text this week
- Re: some comments from people I work with
- Freezing the Best Practices text this week
- Comments and questions about Data Access BP
- Re: old issues we've been ignoring
Tuesday, 5 April 2016
- Fill in the blanks in 'Use Cases Requirements x Best Practices table' https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/247
- Re: old issues we've been ignoring
Friday, 1 April 2016
- Re: New dqv:inDimension
- Recommended approach for future DUV related work...
- Re: dwbp-ACTION-251: Work with ericstephan on creating examples of dataset usage counts in the dqv
- Re: dwbp-ACTION-251: Work with ericstephan on creating examples of dataset usage counts in the dqv
- Re: dwbp-ACTION-260: to ensure text makes clear that dimensions anad categories are defined as subclasses of skos:concept
- Re: dwbp-ACTION-260: to ensure text makes clear that dimensions anad categories are defined as subclasses of skos:concept
- Re: Persistent URIs for Dimensions and Categories cited in DQV
- Re: Persistent URIs for Dimensions and Categories cited in DQV
- Persistent URIs for Dimensions and Categories cited in DQV
- Today
- Re: Example of BP Provide real-time access
- some comments from people I work with
- Re: old issues we've been ignoring
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow's meeting
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow's meeting
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow's meeting
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow's meeting
- Help with example about Provide structural metadata
- Re: Example of BP Provide real-time access