- From: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
- Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 11:52:12 -0300
- To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Cc: "public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CANx1PzwznLQ18dWMxOw6mCwHZLrHV9RrzSCu_vo2w10gHQ+SkA@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks again Antoine! cheers, Berna 2016-04-08 11:02 GMT-03:00 Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>: > Hi Bernadette. > > Indeed I prefer not use the future tense. Present is more affirmative. But > I'm going to abide to you editors or to native speakers: it's not crucial > to me... > > Cheers, > > Antoine > > On 4/8/16 3:54 PM, Bernadette Farias Lóscio wrote: > >> Hi Antoine, >> >> Thanks a lot for your fast response! >> >> Are you ok with using the future tense? >> >> For example: "Using standardized code lists and other commonly used terms >> will enhance interoperability and consensus among data publishers and >> consumers." >> >> Our idea is that if the publisher uses the BP then "something will >> happen". We used the future tense in other BPs. Does it make sense for you? >> >> Thanks again! >> Bernadette >> >> 2016-04-08 10:44 GMT-03:00 Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl <mailto: >> aisaac@few.vu.nl>>: >> >> >> Hi Bernadette. >> >> Hmmm, rather than writing reaction here are my suggestions: >> >> For BP15 : >> "Using standardized code lists and other commonly used terms enhances >> interoperability and consensus among data publishers and consumers." >> >> For BP16: >> "When two datasets or metadata sets use the same vocabulary, it is >> easier for humans and machines alike to compare them, and (automatic) >> processing tools designed for one can be more easily applied to the other. >> This greatly facilitates re-use of data." >> >> Antoine >> >> >> On 4/8/16 2:50 PM, Bernadette Farias Lóscio wrote: >> >> Hi Antoine, >> >> We are making some editorial changes on the DWBP document and we >> made some updates on the intended oucome of some BPs. I'd like to ask if >> you agree with the rewriting of the following Data Vocabularies BP: >> >> Best Practice 15: Use standardized terms >> >> *** current version: >> >> The benefit of using standardized code lists and other commonly >> used terms is to enhance interoperability and consensus among data >> publishers and consumers. >> >> >> *** proposal: >> >> Standardized code lists and other commonly used terms will >> enhance interoperability and consensus among data publishers and consumers. >> >> >> Best Practice 16: Reuse vocabularies >> >> *** current version: >> >> Datasets and metadata sets are easier to be compared by humans or >> machines when they use the same vocabulary to describe metadata. >> >> When two datasets or metadata sets use the same vocabulary, >> (automatic) processing tools designed for one can be more easily applied to >> the other. This greatly facilitates re-use of datasets. >> >> *** proposal: >> >> Using the same vocabulary to describe metadata will make datasets >> and metadata sets easier to be compared by humans or machines. When two >> datasets or metadata sets use the same vocabulary, (automatic) processing >> tools designed for one can be more easily applied to the other. This >> greatly facilitates re-use of datasets. >> >> >> Thanks a lot! >> Bernadette >> >> >> -- >> Bernadette Farias Lóscio >> Centro de Informática >> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Bernadette Farias Lóscio >> Centro de Informática >> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > -- Bernadette Farias Lóscio Centro de Informática Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 8 April 2016 14:53:02 UTC