- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 13:53:35 +0200
- To: <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Perfect! Thanks a lot, Phil. Antoine On 28/04/16 11:21, Phil Archer wrote: > Done. As in, I removed that line and re-inserted the schema.org example. although I moved it to the implementation section, right after the bit about SKOS. > > > > On 27/04/2016 21:42, Antoine Isaac wrote: >> Hi Phil, >> >> This is a good re-write! I'd support it except for two minor comments: >> >> - I'd remove "It is always simpler to create your own vocabulary than to >> reuse someone else's, but in doing so, you isolate your data from the >> rest of the Web and make it harder for others to use." this may be too >> close to the previous BP, and I feel that without it the text read also >> well. >> >> - I'm quite keen on having the schema.org example as it shows how >> ontological commitment has been systematically minimized for the benefit >> of a community. And to me it reads a bit more concrete than the bus stop >> (or maybe it's just the rendering of it in this new BP) >> >> Cheers, >> >> Antoine >> >> On 27/04/16 19:12, Phil Archer wrote: >>> During a call with Annette, Antoine and the BP editors yesterday I >>> took an action to rewrite the Choose the right formalization level BP >>> taking into account various comments. I have done this as can be seen at >>> http://philarcher1.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#ChooseRightFormalizationLevel >>> >>> I've added it to my pull request should others think it's an >>> improvement. It's a hard one to write since it is all about judgement >>> rather than anything concrete. >>> >>> >>> >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 28 April 2016 11:54:07 UTC