Re: Freezing the Best Practices text this week

Hi Hadley,

Thanks for your message!

We were checking the issues and we think that the following ones can be
closed:

1. https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/160: the BP was included in
the doc.

2. https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/208: We discussed this issue
about subsetting data with the SDW group. Annette’s proposal for the
subsetting BP was rewritten based on our discussions.

3. https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/241: We discussed these
aspects and they are mentioned in the Subsetting BP.

4. https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/248: We agreed to leave a note
on the doc asking feedback about the name of the section.

5. https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/250: The section was included
in the doc.


The following issue should be open because we are still asking feedback
about this:

1. https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/251


We still have some open issues that are not on the tracker:

1. Best Practice 15: Use standardized terms x Best Practice 16: Reuse
vocabularies

Annette sent some messages [1][2] pointing out that these BP are
confusing.  We suggest to include a note in the document asking feedback
about this. In this case, should we raise an issue on the tracker?

2. We are still trying to solve some issues with Annette [2][3][4]. But we
think this won’t be a problem for the voting on next Friday.

3. Update Intended Outcomes and How to Test sections according to the
feedback of the group. Ig evaluated the BP and proposed some changes on the
tests and intended outcomes. We still don’t have a feedback from the group
about this.

In the comments tracker, we have one open comment (LC-3047) [5]. The
comments from Erik Wilde were addressed and messages were sent to him.
However, he didn’t answer back.

We are still working on the document to make more improvements before the
next publication and we believe that's gonna be possible to freeze the
document this Friday.

Cheers,
Berna, Carol and Newton
BP Editors


[1]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2016Mar/0014.html
[2]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2016Apr/0007.html
[3]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2016Apr/0006.html
[4]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2016Apr/0022.html
[5]
https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/WD-dwbp-20150224/3047




2016-04-06 10:03 GMT-03:00 Hadley Beeman <hadley@linkedgov.org>:

> Hello all!  (Especially Best Practices editors and contributors)
>
> I hope you're having a good week!
>
> We chairs have just met (as we do, on Wednesdays) and looked at the
> calendar...  For the BP doc to be resolved in time, we need to freeze the
> text [1] on Friday for working group review.
>
> (I feel like that needs big dramatic music and some capital letters...
> FREEZE THE TEXT ON FRIDAY!! It's a big thing.)
>
> To make this happen, we need to resolve ALL issues [2] (apart from the
> ones that we agreed in last week's meeting would ask the community for
> input)[3].  So it would be great if we could make that happen over the next
> 48 hours.
>
> I'll send out an agenda tomorrow, but this week's working group call will
> mostly be checking in on the vocals and clearing away actions, so we need
> to get as much done as we can on the mailing list.
>
> Things to remember, editors:
> 1.  We do have to get the working group to vote to publish the doc (next
> Friday, after spending this week reviewing it).  So resolving outstanding
> issues with members of the group should be helpful for that.
> 2.  You are holding the pen.  If there's something you're not sure about,
> and the group hasn't discussed it — go ahead and decide!  If it causes any
> trouble, it will come up in our review.
>
> I know it's a lot to cover in a short period of time, but we're so close!
> The chairs are here; do let us know if we can help.
>
> Cheers,
>
>    Hadley
>
> [1] http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html
> [2] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/?sort=product
>
> [3] We're having a little issue with last Friday's minutes.  Because
> they're not posted yet, I'll paste  the relevant sections here:
>
> RESOLVED: we keep the section in, keep the 3 BPs in, make the title "Data
> Reuse/Data usage", create a specific issue and ask for feedback on it.
>
> deirdrelee: Final issue on the Preservation section — we didn't have a
> vote, but I hope everyone is okay with adding an issue on that and asking
> for external comments.
>
>
>


-- 
Bernadette Farias Lóscio
Centro de Informática
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
----------------------------------------------------------------------------