- From: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 13:31:46 -0700
- To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
Sorry, but there is no way I'm going to vote yes on a document that is going to change as much as we've been talking about changing it, nor would I vote to publish a document that I know still needs those changes. We need to give the editors the time they need to do the work. -Annette On 4/14/16 12:11 PM, yaso wrote: > Hi all > > Thanks Annette for your always valuable inputs, and editors. I think > that we could follow the agenda as it is, but making sure that the 1st > 30 min of the call will be to address issues and suggestions that > block voting, and then voting. > > > > > > > On 04/14/2016 03:59 PM, Phil Archer wrote: >> I am working on my review. I've taken the second half - it's a big job >> as I'm also making comments for a separate thread *after* publication. >> I'll make the pull request before I drop offline in about an hour's >> time. >> >> On 14/04/2016 19:32, Caroline Burle wrote: >>> Dear Annette, >>> >>> thank you for raising that, we were just discussing about it. :) >>> >>> Since we didn't have any feedback from the WG participants during this >>> week (as we agreed on last week call) and consequently didn't >>> discuss it >>> by email, we were going to suggest during the meeting tomorrow to >>> include Chris Little's [1] and Renato Iannella's [2] suggestions >>> (considering your answer to Lewis [3]) in the next Draft. If the group >>> doesn't agree, we think we could vote the document as it is and include >>> their suggestions only in the CR. >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> BP Editors >>> >>> [1] >>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-comments/2016Apr/0004.html >>> >>> [2] >>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-comments/2016Apr/0000.html >>> >>> [3] >>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-comments/2016Apr/0006.html >>> >>> >>> >>> On 14/04/16 14:35, Annette Greiner wrote: >>>> So, when will the changes that result from this week's review get >>>> addressed? I thought there would be some attempt at that before the >>>> actual vote. Otherwise, I think I already know how I'm going to vote. >>>> -Annette >>>> >>>> On 4/14/16 7:04 AM, yaso@nic.br wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This is the agenda for our call, when we expect to vote BP Doc and >>>>> DQV >>>>> https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20160415 >>>>> >>>>> Inputs are welcome! >>>>> Please if you want to include a topic, send and email so we can >>>>> include it prior to tomorrow. >>>>> >>>>> cheers >>>>> yaso >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> > -- Annette Greiner NERSC Data and Analytics Services Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Received on Thursday, 14 April 2016 20:32:01 UTC