Re: Agenda for tomorrow (15/04/2016)

Sorry, but there is no way I'm going to vote yes on a document that is 
going to change as much as we've been talking about changing it, nor 
would I vote to publish a document that I know still needs those 
changes. We need to give the editors the time they need to do the work.
-Annette

On 4/14/16 12:11 PM, yaso wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Thanks Annette for your always valuable inputs, and editors. I think 
> that we could follow the agenda as it is, but making sure that the 1st 
> 30 min of the call will be to address issues and suggestions that 
> block voting, and then voting.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 04/14/2016 03:59 PM, Phil Archer wrote:
>> I am working on my review. I've taken the second half - it's a big job
>> as I'm also making comments for a separate thread *after* publication.
>> I'll make the pull request before I drop offline in about an hour's 
>> time.
>>
>> On 14/04/2016 19:32, Caroline Burle wrote:
>>> Dear Annette,
>>>
>>> thank you for raising that, we were just discussing about it. :)
>>>
>>> Since we didn't have any feedback from the WG participants during this
>>> week (as we agreed on last week call) and consequently didn't 
>>> discuss it
>>> by email, we were going to suggest during the meeting tomorrow to
>>> include Chris Little's [1] and Renato Iannella's [2] suggestions
>>> (considering your answer to Lewis [3]) in the next Draft. If the group
>>> doesn't agree, we think we could vote the document as it is and include
>>> their suggestions only in the CR.
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> BP Editors
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-comments/2016Apr/0004.html 
>>>
>>> [2]
>>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-comments/2016Apr/0000.html 
>>>
>>> [3]
>>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-comments/2016Apr/0006.html 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 14/04/16 14:35, Annette Greiner wrote:
>>>> So, when will the changes that result from this week's review get
>>>> addressed? I thought there would be some attempt at that before the
>>>> actual vote. Otherwise, I think I already know how I'm going to vote.
>>>> -Annette
>>>>
>>>> On 4/14/16 7:04 AM, yaso@nic.br wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is the agenda for our call, when we expect to vote BP Doc and 
>>>>> DQV
>>>>> https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20160415
>>>>>
>>>>> Inputs are welcome!
>>>>> Please if you want to include a topic, send and email so we can
>>>>> include it prior to tomorrow.
>>>>>
>>>>> cheers
>>>>> yaso
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

-- 
Annette Greiner
NERSC Data and Analytics Services
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Received on Thursday, 14 April 2016 20:32:01 UTC