- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 10:21:39 +0100
- To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>, public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
Done. As in, I removed that line and re-inserted the schema.org example. although I moved it to the implementation section, right after the bit about SKOS. On 27/04/2016 21:42, Antoine Isaac wrote: > Hi Phil, > > This is a good re-write! I'd support it except for two minor comments: > > - I'd remove "It is always simpler to create your own vocabulary than to > reuse someone else's, but in doing so, you isolate your data from the > rest of the Web and make it harder for others to use." this may be too > close to the previous BP, and I feel that without it the text read also > well. > > - I'm quite keen on having the schema.org example as it shows how > ontological commitment has been systematically minimized for the benefit > of a community. And to me it reads a bit more concrete than the bus stop > (or maybe it's just the rendering of it in this new BP) > > Cheers, > > Antoine > > On 27/04/16 19:12, Phil Archer wrote: >> During a call with Annette, Antoine and the BP editors yesterday I >> took an action to rewrite the Choose the right formalization level BP >> taking into account various comments. I have done this as can be seen at >> http://philarcher1.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#ChooseRightFormalizationLevel >> >> I've added it to my pull request should others think it's an >> improvement. It's a hard one to write since it is all about judgement >> rather than anything concrete. >> >> >> > > -- Phil Archer W3C Data Activity Lead http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Thursday, 28 April 2016 09:21:43 UTC