- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 10:28:12 +0100
- To: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>, Caroline Burle <cburle@nic.br>, Newton Calegari <newton@nic.br>, Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Dear editors, As individual e-mails show, I've been addressing the feedback from Annette and Antoine following my suggestions yesterday. So the changes in my latest pull request are: 1. Intro text amended in line with Annette's desire for more explicit references to the Web. 2. As part of that, I added in a new sentence: "However, this growth is not consistent in style and in many cases does not make use of the full potential of the Open Web Platform's ability to link one fact to another, to discover related resources and to create interactive visualizations." 3. I also added a reference to the Open data Barometer as well as the Open Knowledge index. 4. Use persistent URIs as identifiers of datasets - How to Test section slightly reworded in line with Annette's suggestions. 5. Choose the right formalization level - amended in line with Antoine's comments on yesterday's amendments. 6. Amended reference to ODRL to use ReSpec's own library rather than the local bibliography. Diff visible at http://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Fw3c.github.io%2Fdwbp%2Fbp.html&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Fphilarcher1.github.io%2Fdwbp%2Fbp.html I just have one more section to look at today - data preservation. Cheers Phil. -- Phil Archer W3C Data Activity Lead http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Thursday, 28 April 2016 09:28:22 UTC