- From: Riccardo Albertoni <albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>
- Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 16:33:01 +0200
- To: "Debattista, Jeremy" <Jeremy.Debattista@iais.fraunhofer.de>
- Cc: DWBP Public List <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Message-ID: <CAOHhXmR9OobrS3apOupXYvjZQAfQK1YUDU-nfGTdkjgD8w8Dgw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Jeremy, Cool! it seems that in [1] is defined the tbox for dimension, categories and metrics listed by Zaveri et al., and no individuals are provided. Whilst in [2], we are basically serving the Abox individuals for Dimension and Categories. So I still think there are good reasons for having both with persistent URIs. Do you agree? @All, In order to make available [2] with persistent URI, Does anyone have any preference among the following options? A- w3id.org B- put such piece of rdf under a group w3c namespace C- the DQV namespace, C1- a subdomain of it Cheers, Riccardo [1] http://purl.org/eis/vocab/dqm [2] https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/blob/gh-pages/ldqd.ttl On 1 April 2016 at 11:35, Debattista, Jeremy < Jeremy.Debattista@iais.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > FYI: almost all of quality dimensions and categories described in Zaveri > et al. are already described [1] and used in DIACHRON and other cases. > > Cheers, > Jer > > [1] http://purl.org/eis/vocab/dqm > > > On 01 Apr 2016, at 11:15, Riccardo Albertoni <albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it> > wrote: > > Dear all, > > In the current version of DQV document, we provide an extra rdf file > [1](still in progress) which includes the quality dimensions and categories > described in [2]. > > These dimensions and categories are not part of the core data quality > vocabulary specification, since, in principle anyone can define their own > classification for quality dimensions. However, we think that having such > as rdf file properly available, as it provides a good starting point to > which third parties can reference if they need or like. > > Applying our own best practice would require persistent URI. > In order to get persistent URIs, purl.org is not an option at the moment: > it is not possible to create new purls. > > So the questions are: > - Are there other services similar to Purl.org <http://purl.org> we might > consider? w3id.org? > - Should we put such piece of rdf under a group w3c namespace? The DQV > namespace, or a subdomain of it? > > Cheers, > Riccardo and Antoine > > > [1] https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/blob/gh-pages/ldqd.ttl (Still in progress) > [2] Amrapali Zaveri, Anisa Rula, Andrea Maurino, Ricardo Pietrobon, Jens > Lehmann, Sören Auer: Quality assessment for Linked Data: A Survey. Semantic > Web 7(1): 63-93 (2016) https://dx.doi.org/10.3233/SW-150175 > > > > > -- > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Riccardo Albertoni > Istituto per la Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche "Enrico > Magenes" > Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche > via de Marini 6 - 16149 GENOVA - ITALIA > tel. +39-010-6475624 - fax +39-010-6475660 > e-mail: Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it > Skype: callto://riccardoalbertoni/ > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardoalbertoni > www: *http://www.imati.cnr.it/ <http://www.imati.cnr.it/>* > http://purl.oclc.org/NET/riccardoAlbertoni > FOAF:http://purl.oclc.org/NET/RiccardoAlbertoni/foaf > > > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Riccardo Albertoni Istituto per la Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche "Enrico Magenes" Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche via de Marini 6 - 16149 GENOVA - ITALIA tel. +39-010-6475624 - fax +39-010-6475660 e-mail: Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it Skype: callto://riccardoalbertoni/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardoalbertoni www: *http://www.imati.cnr.it/ <http://www.imati.cnr.it/>* http://purl.oclc.org/NET/riccardoAlbertoni FOAF:http://purl.oclc.org/NET/RiccardoAlbertoni/foaf
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2016 14:33:33 UTC