DWBP - Best Practices - Review

 

Dear editors, 

First of all congratulations. 

I was pleased to read the document and to see that it covers a very good
set of concerns that someone has to think about if she wants to
establish a good communication process between publishers and consumers
of datasets. Besides that, the document deals with other related
concerns about identification, preservation, privacy, enrichment, etc. 

My single objection is still about the BPs that deal with the reuse of
data. I still think they are a very very small set of things that
someone who wants to reuse data should think about. We vote it. But I
have to comment this in my review. It makes me feel that we start to
talk about a thing that needs much more thinking and much more best
practices. 

Some minor errors: 

1. The term "best practice" sometimes is written in lower cases and
sometimes in upper cases. 

2. The example of dataset used in the document has changed from
timetables to bus stops tables but in the file [1] "Example of Dataset -
Human readable" we have a mixed thing. 

Thank you again to the editors and to all members of the group. 

Best Regards, Laufer 

[1] -
http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/dwbp-example.html#dataset-strucutral-metadata
[1] 

-- 
. . . .. . . 
. . . ..
. .. . 

 

Links:
------
[1]
http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/dwbp-example.html#dataset-strucutral-metadata