- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 10:02:55 -0400
- To: Riccardo Albertoni <albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>
- CC: DWBP Public List <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Hi Riccardo, Great, thx! Antoine On 14/04/16 06:07, Riccardo Albertoni wrote: > Hi Antoine, > > On 14 April 2016 at 05:54, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl <mailto:aisaac@few.vu.nl>> wrote: > > Hi Riccardo, > > Belated reaction... > > The description of wasDerivedFrom is good. I mean, I personally don't like it, but this is the one in PROV... > Do ou think it's possible to add a link to the example for wasDerivedFrom [3] in one of the notes, or in an extra note, or as a sentence next to the table? > > I have added a sentence. > > > About transforming the note after dqv:qualityAssessment into a usage note. I'm ok with this in theory. But the problem is that it's less visible. I feel that if we do this we should create a new (sub-)section about extending motivations. Or add a new Note after the qualityAssessment table, saying that in the future DQV should have one such (sub-)section. > > > Ok .. I am going to leave it as it is at least for the moment. > > Cheers, > Riccardo > > > Cheers, > > Antoine > > [3] http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/vocab-dqg.html#expressQualityDerivation > > On 23/03/16 06:54, Riccardo Albertoni wrote: > > I am closing action 225 then :) > > I have added the wasDerivedForm as Property in the Vocabulary specification[1]. > Any suggestions/modifications on the new property description? > Moreover, writing down the usage note of wasDerivedFrom, I've realized that the note placed below the quality assessment instance (resulting from ACTION-256 [2]) could be more coherently turned into a usage note. > can we make this transformation? > > cheers, > Riccardo > > [1]http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/vocab-dqg.html#prov:wasDerivedFrom > > [2] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/256 > > On 23 March 2016 at 08:14, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl <mailto:aisaac@few.vu.nl> <mailto:aisaac@few.vu.nl <mailto:aisaac@few.vu.nl>>> wrote: > > Hi Riccardo, > > Thanks a lot! > I've cross-checked this, and it's perfect for me. > > Re "Should prov:wasDerivedFrom be added also as property in the vocabulary documentation" > If it's an important property (and I think it is) then I think it should be added in the documentation. > > Cheers, > > Antoine > > On 3/22/16 7:01 AM, Riccardo Albertoni wrote: > > Dear Antoine and all, > I have introduced the property prov:wasDerivedFrom in the section vocabulary overview [1] > and I've created the example required from this action [2]. > > Therefore, If there are not comments, the action-225 can be closed. > > A question: > Should prov:wasDerivedFrom be added also as property in the vocabulary documentation (section 4)? or would we like to stick to the rule " we won't provide descriptions of properties and classes defined in third party vocabulary? > > Cheers, > [1] http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/vocab-dqg.html#model > [2] http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/vocab-dqg.html#expressQualityDerivation > > On 14 March 2016 at 16:39, Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org <mailto:sysbot%2Btracker@w3.org> <mailto:sysbot%2Btracker@w3.org <mailto:sysbot%252Btracker@w3.org>> <mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org <mailto:sysbot%2Btracker@w3.org> <mailto:sysbot%2Btracker@w3.org <mailto:sysbot%252Btracker@w3.org>>>> wrote: > > dwbp-ACTION-255: Create an example using prov:wasderivedfrom in the dqv, close issue-222 > > http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/255 > > Assigned to: Riccardo Albertoni > > > > > > > > > > > -- > This message has been scanned by E.F.A. Project and is believed to be clean. > > > > > > -- > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Riccardo Albertoni > Istituto per la Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche "Enrico Magenes" > Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche > via de Marini 6 - 16149 GENOVA - ITALIA > tel. +39-010-6475624 <tel:%2B39-010-6475624> <tel:%2B39-010-6475624> - fax +39-010-6475660 <tel:%2B39-010-6475660> <tel:%2B39-010-6475660> > e-mail: Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it <mailto:Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it> <mailto:Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it <mailto:Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>> <mailto:Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it <mailto:Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it> <mailto:Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it <mailto:Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>>> > Skype: callto://riccardoalbertoni/ > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardoalbertoni > www: _http://www.imati.cnr.it/_ > http://purl.oclc.org/NET/riccardoAlbertoni > FOAF:http://purl.oclc.org/NET/RiccardoAlbertoni/foaf > > > > > > -- > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Riccardo Albertoni > Istituto per la Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche "Enrico Magenes" > Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche > via de Marini 6 - 16149 GENOVA - ITALIA > tel. +39-010-6475624 <tel:%2B39-010-6475624> - fax +39-010-6475660 <tel:%2B39-010-6475660> > e-mail: Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it <mailto:Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it> <mailto:Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it <mailto:Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>> > Skype: callto://riccardoalbertoni/ > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardoalbertoni > www: _http://www.imati.cnr.it/_ > http://purl.oclc.org/NET/riccardoAlbertoni > FOAF:http://purl.oclc.org/NET/RiccardoAlbertoni/foaf > > > > > -- > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Riccardo Albertoni > Istituto per la Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche "Enrico Magenes" > Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche > via de Marini 6 - 16149 GENOVA - ITALIA > tel. +39-010-6475624 - fax +39-010-6475660 > e-mail: Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it <mailto:Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it> > Skype: callto://riccardoalbertoni/ > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardoalbertoni > www: _http://www.imati.cnr.it/_ > http://purl.oclc.org/NET/riccardoAlbertoni > FOAF:http://purl.oclc.org/NET/RiccardoAlbertoni/foaf
Received on Thursday, 14 April 2016 14:03:28 UTC