Re: DWBP - Best Practices - Review

Hi Laufer,
I hope the doc will end up being something that you can support fully. 
If you could offer some examples of things that someone who wants to 
reuse data should think about that are not covered by our other BPs, we 
could talk about whether we need to address them.
-Annette

On 4/18/16 9:02 AM, Laufer wrote:
>
> Dear editors,
>
> First of all congratulations.
>
> I was pleased to read the document and to see that it covers a very 
> good set of concerns that someone has to think about if she wants to 
> establish a good communication process between publishers and 
> consumers of datasets. Besides that, the document deals with other 
> related concerns about identification, preservation, privacy, 
> enrichment, etc.
>
> My single objection is still about the BPs that deal with the reuse of 
> data. I still think they are a very very small set of things that 
> someone who wants to reuse data should think about. We vote it. But I 
> have to comment this in my review. It makes me feel that we start to 
> talk about a thing that needs much more thinking and much more best 
> practices.
>
> Some minor errors:
>
> 1. The term "best practice" sometimes is written in lower cases and 
> sometimes in upper cases.
>
> 2. The example of dataset used in the document has changed from 
> timetables to bus stops tables but in the file [1] "Example of Dataset 
> - Human readable" we have a mixed thing.
>
> Thank you again to the editors and to all members of the group.
>
> Best Regards, Laufer
>
> [1] - 
> http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/dwbp-example.html#dataset-strucutral-metadata
>
> -- 
>
> .  .  .  .. .  .
> .        .   . ..
> .     ..       .
>

-- 
Annette Greiner
NERSC Data and Analytics Services
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory