Re: DWBP - Best Practices - Review

hi all,

when it comes to synchronization, as mentioned by Laufer, this might
be relevant:

http://www.openarchives.org/rs/1.0/resourcesync

Herbert

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Laufer <laufer@globo.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi, Annette,
>
> Thank you for your response.
>
> I am just recording that this is a thing that I am worried. I have to put it
> in a review. The group has already voted to include these BPs and it is a
> solved issue.
>
> I gave examples in the e-mails prior to the voting. Things like how to
> maintain synchronicity with versions, how to  choose vocabularies that could
> be more suited depending on the datasets reused, how to merge different
> reused datasets concepts, URI identification schemes, etc. Reuse, imho, is a
> very sophisticated task, and I feel that we finished the document just
> beginning what could be BPs for reuse, a very short set.
>
> I think we have no time to go deeper in these discussions. Again, just
> recording this is my review.
>
> Best Regards, Laufer
>
> ---
>
> .  .  .  .. .  .
> .        .   . ..
> .     ..       .
>
>
>
> Em 18/04/2016 17:28, Annette Greiner escreveu:
>
> Hi Laufer,
> I hope the doc will end up being something that you can support fully. If
> you could offer some examples of things that someone who wants to reuse data
> should think about that are not covered by our other BPs, we could talk
> about whether we need to address them.
> -Annette
>
> On 4/18/16 9:02 AM, Laufer wrote:
>
>
>
> Dear editors,
>
> First of all congratulations.
>
> I was pleased to read the document and to see that it covers a very good set
> of concerns that someone has to think about if she wants to establish a good
> communication process between publishers and consumers of datasets. Besides
> that, the document deals with other related concerns about identification,
> preservation, privacy, enrichment, etc.
>
> My single objection is still about the BPs that deal with the reuse of data.
> I still think they are a very very small set of things that someone who
> wants to reuse data should think about. We vote it. But I have to comment
> this in my review. It makes me feel that we start to talk about a thing that
> needs much more thinking and much more best practices.
>
> Some minor errors:
>
> 1. The term "best practice" sometimes is written in lower cases and
> sometimes in upper cases.
>
> 2. The example of dataset used in the document has changed from timetables
> to bus stops tables but in the file [1] "Example of Dataset - Human
> readable" we have a mixed thing.
>
> Thank you again to the editors and to all members of the group.
>
> Best Regards, Laufer
>
>
>
> [1] -
> http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/dwbp-example.html#dataset-strucutral-metadata
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> .  .  .  .. .  .
> .        .   . ..
> .     ..       .
>
>
>
>
> --
> Annette Greiner
> NERSC Data and Analytics Services
> Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
>



-- 
Herbert Van de Sompel
Digital Library Research & Prototyping
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Research Library
http://public.lanl.gov/herbertv/
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0715-6126

==

Received on Monday, 18 April 2016 23:00:03 UTC