- From: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 16:08:13 -0700
- To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>, Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Yes, that's much better. Thanks! -Annette On 4/27/16 10:22 AM, Phil Archer wrote: > Let me offer a slight alternative How to test for "Use persistent URIs > as identifiers of datasets" that I hope addresses your point. > > Currently it says: > > Check that each dataset in question is identified using a URI that has > been assigned under a controlled process. Ideally, the relevant Web > site includes a description of the process and a credible pledge of > persistence should the publisher no longer be able to maintain the URI > space themselves. > > New suggestion: > > Check that each dataset is identified using a URI that has been > designed for persistence. Ideally the relevant Web site includes a > description of the design scheme and a credible pledge of persistence > should the publisher no longer be able to maintain the URI space > themselves. > > Better? > > Phil. > -- Annette Greiner NERSC Data and Analytics Services Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Received on Wednesday, 27 April 2016 23:08:44 UTC