- From: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
- Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 11:24:35 -0300
- To: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>
- Cc: DWBP Public List <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CANx1Pzxj+9kkkAeMti2TJjKqpN4a-HFf6TzC-8b0TsL5aVLvmw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Annette, Thanks a lot ! Having this external feedback is really important for us! My comments are inline. I got a few comments on the BP doc from people I work with today. I asked > them to take a look at BPs 16 and 17 and see if the distinction was clear. > They found the two of them very confusing. One did understand the > formal/informal distinction after first guessing that it was about use vs. > reuse. One noted that it was also confusing to have numbered examples that > have different numbers than the BPs. > I took a new look on these BP and I don't agree that they are confusing (when we look to the examples, the difference is more clear). I talked with Antoine during the F2F and he doesn't agree either. I suggest to include a note in the next draft of the document asking for feedback about this. What do you think? > One person also felt that the multiple formats BP should perhaps only > apply when a dataset is likely to need translation into multiple formats. > Making data available in multiple formats struck her as being burdensome > and unlikely to be done. > We identified several use cases with the requirement for multiple formats [1]. Considering this, I think we should keep the BP. Besides, I'm sure that some BP will be more useful for specific groups. I think it is also difficult to imagine the cases when a dataset needs translation into multiple formats. > > They also noted that the grammar needed attention. > Yes, I agree! We are aware about this ;) Cheers, Berna [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp-ucr/#R-FormatMultiple > > I hope this is helpful, > -Annette > > -- > Annette Greiner > NERSC Data and Analytics Services > Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory > > > -- Bernadette Farias Lóscio Centro de Informática Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 6 April 2016 14:25:23 UTC