public-appformats@w3.org from January 2008 by date

Thursday, 31 January 2008

Re: Proposal for a way to avoid a round-trip on every POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs Subbu Allamaraju
RE: Proposal for a way to avoid a round-trip on every POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs Close, Tyler J.
[access-control] Requirement #5 Arthur Barstow
Re: Proposal for a way to avoid a round-trip on every POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs Thomas Roessler
Re: Proposal for a way to avoid a round-trip on every POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs John Panzer
redirect model for non-GET requests (Re: OPTIONS and redirects (was: Re: Review of 22 Jan editor's draft)) Thomas Roessler
Re: Proposal for a way to avoid a round-trip on every POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs Ian Hickson
Re: Minutes from 30 January 2008 Voice Conference on Access Control Thomas Roessler
Re: Proposal for a way to avoid a round-trip on every POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs Thomas Roessler

Wednesday, 30 January 2008

Proposal for a way to avoid a round-trip on every POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs Ian Hickson
On Requirement 9 and "deny" Thomas Roessler
OPTIONS and redirects (was: Re: Review of 22 Jan editor's draft) Anne van Kesteren
Minutes from 30 January 2008 Voice Conference on Access Control Arthur Barstow
ACTION-158: Input for requirement 1.1 Thomas Roessler
Requirement 10 (Re: Requirement 11) Thomas Roessler
Requirement 11 Thomas Roessler
ACTION-165: New wording for requirement 12 Jonas Sicking
ACTION-162: Suggested new wording for requirement 4 Jonas Sicking
Req 1.2 Thomas Roessler

Tuesday, 29 January 2008

Re: Review of 22 Jan editor's draft Thomas Roessler
Fwd: [rest-discuss] W3C Working Group on Cross-Domain requests needs your feedback Arthur Barstow
Re: ACTION-154: policy decision / enforcement points Thomas Roessler
Re: [access-control] syntax is still suboptimal? Mark Nottingham
Re: [access-control] syntax is still suboptimal? Ian Hickson
Re: [access-control] syntax is still suboptimal? Mark Nottingham
Re: [access-control] syntax is still suboptimal? Anne van Kesteren
Re: [access-control] syntax is still suboptimal? Mark Nottingham

Monday, 28 January 2008

Re: ISSUE-22 (ac4csr-webarch): The AC4CSR spec and "webarch" [Access Control] Arthur Barstow
RE: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Dave Orchard
RE: ISSUE-22 (ac4csr-webarch): The AC4CSR spec and "webarch" [Access Control] David Orchard
Re: ISSUE-22 (ac4csr-webarch): The AC4CSR spec and "webarch" [Access Control] Anne van Kesteren
Agenda for 30 January 2008 Voice Conference Arthur Barstow
[access-control] syntax is still suboptimal? Arthur Barstow
ISSUE-22 (ac4csr-webarch): The AC4CSR spec and "webarch" [Access Control] Web Application Formats Working Group Issue Tracker

Sunday, 27 January 2008

Re: Review of 22 Jan editor's draft Anne van Kesteren

Friday, 25 January 2008

Re: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Mark Nottingham
Re: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Anne van Kesteren
RE: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Ian Hickson
RE: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Close, Tyler J.
RE: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Ian Hickson
RE: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Close, Tyler J.
Re: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Anne van Kesteren
RE: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Close, Tyler J.
Re: ACTION-154: policy decision / enforcement points Jon Ferraiolo
Re: Feedback on Access Control Anne van Kesteren
Re: Feedback on Access Control Thomas Roessler
ACTION-154: policy decision / enforcement points Thomas Roessler
Re: Feedback on Access Control Anne van Kesteren
Re: Feedback on Access Control Thomas Roessler
Re: Feedback on Access Control Anne van Kesteren
Re: Feedback on Access Control Thomas Roessler
Re: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Ian Hickson

Thursday, 24 January 2008

RE: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Close, Tyler J.
Re: Method-Check-Expires (was: Re: Feedback on Access Control) Anne van Kesteren
Re: Method-Check-Expires (was: Re: Feedback on Access Control) Mark Nottingham
Re: Method-Check-Expires (was: Re: Feedback on Access Control) Ian Hickson
RE: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Ian Hickson
RE: [waf] Draft of merged Web Apps WG charter available David Orchard
RE: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Close, Tyler J.
Re: [access-control] Editorial comments on Requirements Appendix v1.137 Anne van Kesteren
Re: [access-control] Editorial comments on Requirements Appendix v1.137 Anne van Kesteren
Re: [access-control] Editorial comments on Requirements Appendix v1.137 Anne van Kesteren
Re: Feedback on Access Control Anne van Kesteren
Re: Feedback on Access Control Anne van Kesteren
Re: Method-Check-Expires Anne van Kesteren
Re: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Anne van Kesteren
Re: Method-Check-Expires (was: Re: Feedback on Access Control) Mark Nottingham
Re: Feedback on Access Control Mark Nottingham
Re: Feedback on Access Control Mark Nottingham
Method-Check-Expires (was: Re: Feedback on Access Control) Anne van Kesteren
Re: Feedback on Access Control Anne van Kesteren
Re: Feedback on Access Control Anne van Kesteren
Re: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Mark Nottingham
Re: time change for WAF WG telcons [was: Minutes from 23 January 2008 Voice Conference on Access Control] Marcos Caceres
Re: time change for WAF WG telcons [was: Minutes from 23 January 2008 Voice Conference on Access Control] Thomas Roessler
Re: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Jonas Sicking
Re: time change for WAF WG telcons [was: Minutes from 23 January 2008 Voice Conference on Access Control] Jonas Sicking
Re: Feedback on Access Control Ian Hickson
Re: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Ian Hickson
time change for WAF WG telcons [was: Minutes from 23 January 2008 Voice Conference on Access Control] Michael(tm) Smith
Re: [access-control] Editorial comments on Requirements Appendix v1.137 Ian Hickson

Wednesday, 23 January 2008

Re: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Mark Nottingham
Re: Feedback on Access Control Mark Nottingham
Re: Feedback on Access Control Anne van Kesteren
Re: [access-control] Editorial comments on Requirements Appendix v1.137 Jonas Sicking
RE: [access-control] Editorial comments on Requirements Appendix v1.137 David Orchard
Re: [access-control] Editorial comments on Requirements Appendix v1.137 Jon Ferraiolo
Minutes from 23 January 2008 Voice Conference on Access Control Arthur Barstow
P3P - Feedback on Access Control Anne van Kesteren
Re: Feedback on Access Control Mark Nottingham
Re: [access-control] Editorial comments on Requirements Appendix v1.137 Jonas Sicking
Review of 22 Jan editor's draft Thomas Roessler
Re: [access-control] Editorial comments on Requirements Appendix v1.137 Jon Ferraiolo
[access-control] Editorial comments on Requirements Appendix v1.137 Arthur Barstow
Re: Feedback on Access Control Jonas Sicking
Re: Feedback on Access Control Mark Nottingham
Re: Feedback on Access Control Jonas Sicking
Re: Feedback on Access Control Mark Nottingham
Re: Access Control: integrated Requirements, Use Cases and FAQ Jonas Sicking
Re: Feedback on Access Control Mark Nottingham
Re: Feedback on Access Control Jonas Sicking

Tuesday, 22 January 2008

Re: Feedback on Access Control Anne van Kesteren
Re: Feedback on Access Control Anne van Kesteren
Re: Feedback on Access Control Anne van Kesteren
Re: Access Control open/raised issues Anne van Kesteren
RE: Access Control open/raised issues David Orchard
Re: Feedback on Access Control Mark Nottingham
Re: Access Control open/raised issues Arthur Barstow
Re: Feedback on Access Control Ian Hickson
Re: Feedback on Access Control Anne van Kesteren
Feedback on Access Control Mark Nottingham

Monday, 21 January 2008

Re: Access Control: integrated Requirements, Use Cases and FAQ Anne van Kesteren
RE: Access Control: integrated Requirements, Use Cases and FAQ David Orchard
Agenda for 23 January 2008 Voice Conf Arthur Barstow
Re: Access Control: integrated Requirements, Use Cases and FAQ Arthur Barstow
Re: FAQ & Use Cases Anne van Kesteren

Saturday, 19 January 2008

Re: Access Control: integrated Requirements, Use Cases and FAQ Anne van Kesteren
Re: Access Control: integrated Requirements, Use Cases and FAQ Anne van Kesteren
RE: Access Control: integrated Requirements, Use Cases and FAQ David Orchard
Re: FAQ & Use Cases Jonas Sicking
Re: FAQ & Use Cases Jon Ferraiolo

Friday, 18 January 2008

Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Jonas Sicking
Re: FAQ & Use Cases Jonas Sicking
Re: FAQ & Use Cases Jonas Sicking
[fwd] common dns misconfiguration can lead to "same site" scripting (from: taviso@sdf.lonestar.org) Thomas Roessler
Re: Access Control: integrated Requirements, Use Cases and FAQ Jon Ferraiolo
Re: [ac] Security concerns Arthur Barstow
Re: <form> POST versus Access Control POST Thomas Roessler
Re: <form> POST versus Access Control POST Anne van Kesteren
Access Control: integrated Requirements, Use Cases and FAQ Anne van Kesteren
Re: linking pre-check to POST and other requests? Anne van Kesteren
Re: linking pre-check to POST and other requests? Jonas Sicking

Thursday, 17 January 2008

Re: <form> POST versus Access Control POST Ian Hickson
Fwd: Access Control open/raised issues Arthur Barstow
Re: Access Control open/raised issues Jonas Sicking
Re: Access control requirements Jonas Sicking
Re: Access control requirements Arthur Barstow
Re: <form> POST versus Access Control POST Mark Baker
Access Control open/raised issues Anne van Kesteren
Re: FAQ & Use Cases Anne van Kesteren
Re: FAQ & Use Cases Arthur Barstow
[ac] Security concerns Jonas Sicking
Re: <form> POST versus Access Control POST Jonas Sicking
Access control requirements Jonas Sicking
Re: FAQ & Use Cases Thomas Roessler

Wednesday, 16 January 2008

Re: FAQ & Use Cases Jon Ferraiolo
Re: linking pre-check to POST and other requests? Thomas Roessler
Re: Use case for cross-site DELETE, PUT, ...? Thomas Roessler
Re: Use case for cross-site DELETE, PUT, ...? Thomas Roessler
Re: Use case for cross-site DELETE, PUT, ...? Anne van Kesteren
Re: linking pre-check to POST and other requests? Ian Hickson
[waf] Minutes from 16 January 2008 Voice Conference on Access Control Arthur Barstow
linking pre-check to POST and other requests? Thomas Roessler
Use case for cross-site DELETE, PUT, ...? Thomas Roessler
Re: FAQ & Use Cases Thomas Roessler
Re: Access-Control: Proposed restructuring James Graham
Re: Access-Control: Proposed restructuring Anne van Kesteren
RE: Access-Control: Proposed restructuring David Orchard
Re: Access-Control: Proposed restructuring Anne van Kesteren
RE: Access-Control: Proposed restructuring Ian Hickson
Re: FAQ & Use Cases Ian Hickson
RE: Access-Control: Proposed restructuring David Orchard
Re: Access-Control: Proposed restructuring Thomas Roessler
Re: Access-Control: Proposed restructuring Ian Hickson
Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Thomas Roessler
RE: specification style; last call David Orchard
Access-Control: Proposed restructuring David Orchard
Re: FAQ & Use Cases Jon Ferraiolo
RE: Request for review on Access Control for Cross-site Requests Grosso, Paul
specification style; last call Thomas Roessler
[ac] XBL Use Case input Arthur Barstow
FAQ & Use Cases Anne van Kesteren
<form> POST versus Access Control POST Anne van Kesteren
Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Anne van Kesteren
Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Anne van Kesteren
Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Anne van Kesteren
Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Bjoern Hoehrmann
Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Jon Ferraiolo

Tuesday, 15 January 2008

[waf] Access Control Issue 19: Requirements document updated dated 20080114 David Orchard
Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Arthur Barstow
Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Anne van Kesteren
RE: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Jon Ferraiolo
RE: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document David Orchard
RE: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Jon Ferraiolo
RE: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Brad Porter
RE: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document David Orchard
Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Anne van Kesteren
Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Jon Ferraiolo
ISSUE-21: What is the Security Model for the access-control spec? [Access Control] Web Application Formats Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Arthur Barstow
Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Anne van Kesteren
Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Mark Nottingham
Re: Examining the 'no server modification' requirement Mark Nottingham

Monday, 14 January 2008

RE: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document David Orchard
Re: More clarity about cookie handling Thomas Roessler
Fwd: OPTIONS and Method-Check Arthur Barstow
Minutes from WAF WG's 9 January 2008 meeting Arthur Barstow
Re: More clarity about cookie handling Anne van Kesteren

Sunday, 13 January 2008

Re: More clarity about cookie handling Thomas Roessler
Re: OPTIONS and Method-Check Ian Hickson

Saturday, 12 January 2008

Re: [waf] Draft of merged Web Apps WG charter available Arthur Barstow
Re: [waf] minutes from 9 January 2008 Voice Conf (fwd) Anne van Kesteren
Re: Examining the 'no server modification' requirement Thomas Roessler
Comments on requirements document Thomas Roessler
Re: [waf] minutes from 9 January 2008 Voice Conf (fwd) Brad Porter
Re: [waf] minutes from 9 January 2008 Voice Conf (fwd) Anne van Kesteren
Re: [waf] minutes from 9 January 2008 Voice Conf (fwd) Mark Nottingham
RE: [waf] Draft of merged Web Apps WG charter available David Orchard

Friday, 11 January 2008

Re: [waf] minutes from 9 January 2008 Voice Conf (fwd) Jon Ferraiolo
Re: [waf] minutes from 9 January 2008 Voice Conf (fwd) Jon Ferraiolo
[access-control] Requirements, UCs and design rationale [Was: Subject: Re: [waf] minutes from 9 January 2008 Voice Conf (fwd) ] Arthur Barstow
RE: [waf] minutes from 9 January 2008 Voice Conf (fwd) David Orchard
Re: [waf] minutes from 9 January 2008 Voice Conf (fwd) Ian Hickson
Re: Review of http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-access-control-20071126/ Anne van Kesteren
Re: Examining the 'no server modification' requirement Ian Hickson
Re: Examining the 'no server modification' requirement Ian Hickson
Re: Examining the 'no server modification' requirement Brad Porter
Re: Examining the 'no server modification' requirement Brad Porter
Re: Examining the 'no server modification' requirement Mark Nottingham
Re: Brad Porter
Re: Examining the 'no server modification' requirement Brad Porter

Thursday, 10 January 2008

Re: Mark Nottingham
Examining the 'no server modification' requirement Mark Nottingham
Re: Are Jon's comments from IBM, the OAA, citizen Jon, ...? [Was: Re: Review of http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-access-control-20071126/] Jon Ferraiolo

Wednesday, 9 January 2008

Tuesday, 8 January 2008

Re: ISSUE-20: Client and Server model [Access Control] Brad Porter

Wednesday, 9 January 2008

Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Arthur Barstow
Are Jon's comments from IBM, the OAA, citizen Jon, ...? [Was: Re: Review of http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-access-control-20071126/] Arthur Barstow
Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Arthur Barstow
Re: Review of http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-access-control-20071126/ Anne van Kesteren
Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Anne van Kesteren
Re: Review of http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-access-control-20071126/ Jonas Sicking
Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Mark Nottingham
Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Jon Ferraiolo
Re: Review of http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-access-control-20071126/ Jon Ferraiolo
Re: Review of http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-access-control-20071126/ Mark Nottingham
Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Arthur Barstow
Re: Review of http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-access-control-20071126/ L. David Baron
Review of http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-access-control-20071126/ David Orchard
ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document David Orchard

Tuesday, 8 January 2008

Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Anne van Kesteren
Re: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Thomas Roessler
Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Thomas Roessler
Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Thomas Roessler
RE: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Close, Tyler J.
Re: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Jon Ferraiolo
Re: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Jonas Sicking
Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Mark Nottingham

Monday, 7 January 2008

RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Close, Tyler J.
RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests David Orchard
Re: [waf] New Charter proposal Doug Schepers
Re: GET vs HEAD vs OPTIONS Bertrand Le Roy
Re: GET vs HEAD vs OPTIONS Henri Sivonen
Re: GET vs HEAD vs OPTIONS Henri Sivonen
Re: [waf] New Charter proposal Arthur Barstow
Re: [waf] New Charter proposal Jon Ferraiolo
Re: [waf] New Charter proposal Doug Schepers
Re: [waf] New Charter proposal Mark Nottingham

Sunday, 6 January 2008

Re: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Jon Ferraiolo
Re: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Jonas Sicking
Re: GET vs HEAD vs OPTIONS Jonas Sicking

Saturday, 5 January 2008

Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Emmanouil Batsis (Manos)
Re: GET vs HEAD vs OPTIONS Bjoern Hoehrmann
Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Bjoern Hoehrmann
Re: GET vs HEAD vs OPTIONS Henri Sivonen
Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Henri Sivonen
Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Jonas Sicking
Re: GET vs HEAD vs OPTIONS Bjoern Hoehrmann
Re: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Jon Ferraiolo

Friday, 4 January 2008

RE: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Close, Tyler J.
RE: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Bertrand Le Roy
Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Anne van Kesteren
Re: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Anne van Kesteren
RE: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Close, Tyler J.
RE: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Bertrand Le Roy
Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Anne van Kesteren
Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Bertrand Le Roy
Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Bertrand Le Roy
Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Arthur Barstow
RE: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS David Orchard
Re: ISSUE-20: Client and Server model [Access Control] Anne van Kesteren
RE: ISSUE-20: Client and Server model [Access Control] David Orchard
Re: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Anne van Kesteren
Re: ISSUE-20: Client and Server model [Access Control] Anne van Kesteren
RE: ISSUE-20: Client and Server model [Access Control] Jon Ferraiolo
GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Anne van Kesteren
RE: ISSUE-20: Client and Server model [Access Control] David Orchard
Re: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Jon Ferraiolo
Re: ISSUE-20: Client and Server model [Access Control] Anne van Kesteren
Re: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Anne van Kesteren
Re: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Anne van Kesteren
Re: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Jon Ferraiolo
ISSUE-20: Client and Server model [Access Control] Web Application Formats Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-19: What are the Requirements, Design Principles and Use Cases? [Access Control] Web Application Formats Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Web Application Formats Working Group Issue Tracker

Thursday, 3 January 2008

Re: GET vs HEAD vs OPTIONS Anne van Kesteren
Re: GET vs HEAD vs OPTIONS Jon Ferraiolo
Re: GET vs HEAD vs OPTIONS Anne van Kesteren
RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Close, Tyler J.
Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Jonas Sicking
RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Jon Ferraiolo
GET vs HEAD vs OPTIONS Jon Ferraiolo
RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Close, Tyler J.
Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Jonas Sicking
RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Close, Tyler J.
Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Jonas Sicking
Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Jonas Sicking
Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Jon Ferraiolo
Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Anne van Kesteren
Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Mark Nottingham
RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Ian Hickson
RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Close, Tyler J.
RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Close, Tyler J.
RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Ian Hickson
RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Close, Tyler J.
Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Mark Nottingham
Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Mark Nottingham
Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Jonas Sicking
RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Ian Hickson

Wednesday, 2 January 2008

RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Close, Tyler J.
RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Ian Hickson
Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Ric Johnson
Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Douglas Crockford
Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Anne van Kesteren
RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Close, Tyler J.
Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Anne van Kesteren
RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Close, Tyler J.
Re: [widgets] Open Ajax Alliance Jon Ferraiolo
Fwd: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Arthur Barstow
Re: [widgets] Open Ajax Alliance José Manuel Cantera Fonseca

Tuesday, 1 January 2008

RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Ian Hickson

Last message date: Thursday, 31 January 2008 19:49:21 UTC