- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:53:52 +0000 (UTC)
- To: "Close, Tyler J." <tyler.close@hp.com>
- Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@yahoo-inc.com>, "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Close, Tyler J. wrote: > > > > So each resource requires one additional round-trip. Unless you have a > > very unusual situation where you are manipulating a lot of resources > > only once, the cost is minimal. > > Why is this situtation "very unusual"? It may be common. Say I've got a > secure mashup application that manages an ATOM store. Since it's secure, > the browser cache may be emptied after every visit, so the check > requests will have to be repeated on each use. I do not believe this is the kind of situation we should be optimising for. > It's my understanding that webarch tries to encourage the use of URIs, > not discourage it. I believe the kind of protocol modification you > suggest would be counter to what webarch tries to encourage: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#pr-use-uris I disagree with much of Web Arch. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 25 January 2008 22:54:09 UTC