W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-appformats@w3.org > January 2008

Re: Method-Check-Expires (was: Re: Feedback on Access Control)

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@yahoo-inc.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:51:43 +1100
Cc: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>
Message-Id: <A6AB9D19-B803-4FCD-A31C-931A745E3ADC@yahoo-inc.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>

Method-Check-Maxage?

Use delta-seconds from 2616.


On 24/01/2008, at 10:44 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:

>
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 02:12:06 +0100, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>>> Another (probably better, based upon experience with caching)  
>>> approach
>>> would be to use a delta rather than a http-date.
>>
>> Yeah, I agree that having the header just have a number of seconds  
>> would
>> be better than having an HTTP date.
>
> Ok. Is naming it Method-Check-Expires still acceptable in that case?  
> Also, what is the best BNF syntax to use here?
>
>
> -- 
> Anne van Kesteren
> <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
> <http://www.opera.com/>
>

--
Mark Nottingham       mnot@yahoo-inc.com
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2008 11:52:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:56:21 UTC