Re: [access-control] syntax is still suboptimal?

On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> 
> 1) You'll have to change it anyway if you want to support extensions. I 
> haven't seen a discussion of this yet.

For what it's worth, I actually consider this a feature, not a bug. Making 
extensions to this should be _hard_, to reduce the temptation for people 
to actually extend it. Ideally, this would never be extended.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 02:15:59 UTC