W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-appformats@w3.org > January 2008


From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:54:27 +0100
To: "Thomas Roessler" <tlr@w3.org>, "Henri Sivonen" <hsivonen@iki.fi>, art.barstow@nokia.com
Cc: "Bertrand Le Roy" <Bertrand.Le.Roy@microsoft.com>, "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.t4mx01h664w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:43:51 +0100, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> wrote:
> Art, correct me if I'm wrong -- but I believe the conclusion of that
> discussion was *not* that OPTIONS is deemed rejected, but rather,
> that the group is seeking input from the HTTP community on what
> design to use?
> http://www.w3.org/2007/11/05-waf-minutes#item09

AFAICT OPTIONS is rejected until there's evidence that it can be used.  
Requesting feedback from the HTTP WG on this has been done, though so far  
the HTTP WG has not replied in any official manner.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2008 23:51:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:56:21 UTC