- From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:36:53 -0800
- To: "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>, "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>, "ext Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Cc: "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: public-appformats-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-appformats-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Arthur Barstow I agree that Brad and Ian covered the rationale, but I remain unconvinced. This issue has been raised by at least 3 people, and I think that others may support the server-side PEP position on the issue. I disagree with this issue being closed, because I think there is substantial lack of consensus on this. We've heard from a few vocal people but I think the way forward is to gain a clear understanding of the Working Group's position on this. I think this is far too hasty. > I agree Brad and Ian covered the rationale behind the model > and I think we now have at least some documentation in the > spec to substantiate this design. Consequently, I'm OK with > closing issue this issue. > > However, clearly some of the commentors don't like this > model. I'm open to suggestions on how to address these > concerns e.g. a new Incubator Group, etc. >
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2008 22:37:59 UTC