W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-appformats@w3.org > January 2008

RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests

From: Close, Tyler J. <tyler.close@hp.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 18:11:53 +0000
To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
CC: Jon Ferraiolo <jferrai@us.ibm.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@yahoo-inc.com>, "public-appformats@w3.org" <public-appformats@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C7B67062D31B9E459128006BAAD0DC3D14218A3D@G6W0269.americas.hpqcorp.net>

Jonas Sicking wrote:
> Close, Tyler J. wrote:
> > Hi Jon,
> >
> > Jon Ferraiolo wrote:
> >> * The Access Control mechanism MUST not broaden the attack
> >> surface for hackers, particularly with regard to CSRF
> >
> > Could you elaborate a bit on this contraint? For example, one
>  > interpretation might be that the currently proposed mechanism
>  > violates this constraint since any cookies or HTTP Auth credentials
>  > the user may have are included in the request sent to the server
>  > (the opposite of what's done in the JSONRequest proposal).
> In essense,
>  > the current proposal is one for determining the set of
> hosts that are
>  > allowed to issue CSRF requests, which is a broadening of the CSRF
> attack surface.
> Does this really broaden the attack surface since it is
> already possible
> to do GET requests, that includes cookies and HTTP Auth
> credentials, to
> any uri on any server by simply pointing an <img> to that uri?

The barn door is pretty wide open, but the current proposal does open it even further. For example, it is not currently possible to POST an XML request which includes the user's cookies and HTTP Auth credentials (modulo exploits of various browser plugins). Various web-services may become more vulnerable under the current proposal.

Received on Thursday, 3 January 2008 18:13:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:56:21 UTC