W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-appformats@w3.org > January 2008

Re: OPTIONS and Method-Check

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 05:52:12 +0000 (UTC)
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: "Web API WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>, public-appformats@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0801130551310.13181@hixie.dreamhostps.com>

On Sat, 12 Jan 2008, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> I have left the Method-Check header in the specification, but as the 
> primary (and only?) use case of that header was to indicate that this is 
> an authorization request maybe we should remove it. Opinions?

I think it's useful to keep it as it gives more information to the server 
about what is going on and can help inform the server's response.

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Sunday, 13 January 2008 05:52:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:56:21 UTC