W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-appformats@w3.org > January 2008


From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 13:04:05 +0200
Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>
Message-Id: <A5A42E31-61D3-4BAD-97EC-42F8E5E4CF91@iki.fi>
To: Bertrand Le Roy <Bertrand.Le.Roy@microsoft.com>

On Jan 5, 2008, at 01:10, Bertrand Le Roy wrote:

> I still think it would be interesting to investigate precedents as  
> this seems at first to deviate from usual HTTP GET usage.

It is very clear that the spec deviates from usual HTTP GET usage. The  
HTTPish way would be using OPTIONS with a new response header that had  
application-level caching semantics.

However, OPTIONS has been rejected due to issues in the popular Apache  
server with certain modules.

Henri Sivonen
Received on Saturday, 5 January 2008 11:04:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:56:21 UTC