- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 13:04:05 +0200
- To: Bertrand Le Roy <Bertrand.Le.Roy@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>
On Jan 5, 2008, at 01:10, Bertrand Le Roy wrote: > I still think it would be interesting to investigate precedents as > this seems at first to deviate from usual HTTP GET usage. It is very clear that the spec deviates from usual HTTP GET usage. The HTTPish way would be using OPTIONS with a new response header that had application-level caching semantics. However, OPTIONS has been rejected due to issues in the popular Apache server with certain modules. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Saturday, 5 January 2008 11:04:17 UTC