- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:13:38 +0100
- To: "Thomas Roessler" <tlr@w3.org>
- Cc: "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:05:12 +0100, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> wrote: > On 2008-01-25 13:50:45 +0100, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > >> We already got rid of the comma the first time someone spotted >> the issue. What makes you think this was not resolved? > > The formal grammar when I last read the spec. If you still see the issue in the current draft do let me know: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/access-control/ >> Having said that, you already re-raised this resolved (I think) >> issue in your e-mail I still have to reply to. Please don't >> create so much overhead :-) > > Just be a bit more explicit about the baseline you're looking at > when you say "don't want to change." That helps to avoid overhead > for all of us. Sorry, I don't understand what you're saying. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Friday, 25 January 2008 14:09:53 UTC