W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-appformats@w3.org > January 2008

Re: Access Control open/raised issues

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:48:00 +0100
To: "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>, "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>, "ext Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>
Cc: "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.t5csaamd64w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:36:53 +0100, David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com> wrote:
> I agree that Brad and Ian covered the rationale, but I remain
> unconvinced.  This issue has been raised by at least 3 people, and I
> think that others may support the server-side PEP position on the issue.

The same goes for the opposite position.


> I disagree with this issue being closed, because I think there is
> substantial lack of consensus on this.  We've heard from a few vocal
> people but I think the way forward is to gain a clear understanding of
> the Working Group's position on this.  I think this is far too hasty.

There's no counter proposal that satisfies the requirements. (There's not  
even a concrete proposal.)


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2008 22:44:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:56:21 UTC