W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-appformats@w3.org > January 2008

Re: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control]

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 19:29:10 +0100
To: "Jon Ferraiolo" <jferrai@us.ibm.com>, "Web Application Formats Working Group WG" <public-appformats@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.t4e4awfg64w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 19:15:32 +0100, Jon Ferraiolo <jferrai@us.ibm.com>  
wrote:
> Based on what Kris says above, it seems to me that both HEAD and GET need
> to be supported in order to comply with the HTTP spec.

It seems that Kris was not aware that the entity body of the response is  
significant and that therefore there is a difference. I mentioned this in  
my earlier reply to you.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Friday, 4 January 2008 18:32:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:56:21 UTC