- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:51:07 +0100
- To: "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>, "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:36:41 +0100, David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com> wrote: > The Working Group has not talked about or agreed to integrating the > requirements and use cases into the access control spec. In fact, we > had a discussion last week about going to Note on document. I don't > mind not editing the requirements document if that's bothering you, but > I'd like these changes to be backed out because they do not have any WG > consensus. This WG has always operated in a way that the editor makes changes and the WG reviews them. Also, as the document indicates it's an editor's draft. This is a proposal on how I think we should move forward. Apart from you I haven't heard any objections and I'm not exactly sure what you're objecting against given how this WG has worked so far. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Saturday, 19 January 2008 18:47:54 UTC