- From: Jon Ferraiolo <jferrai@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 06:30:44 -0800
- To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>, public-appformats-request@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFBADE9E3E.0DD2F725-ON882573D4.004EC77E-882573D4.004FB801@us.ibm.com>
I just want to go on record saying that I disagree with some of the
rationale in the FAQ section. I have already described my disagreements in:
* http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2008Jan/0169.html
There was follow-on discussion on some of my points, but bottom-line is the
same: I still disagree with some of the choices and the rationale behind
those choices. Despite my disagreements, however, if Access Control
finishes and gets adopted by industry, it will provide a set of benefits
and costs to the industry. My disagreements are more about how there could
be greater benefit and less cost if different choices were made.
Jon
"Anne van
Kesteren"
<annevk@opera.com To
> "WAF WG (public)"
Sent by: <public-appformats@w3.org>
public-appformats cc
-request@w3.org
Subject
Access Control: integrated
01/18/2008 03:32 Requirements, Use Cases and FAQ
AM
Hi,
To help keep us on track I took the feedback we had on use cases and
requirements so far and integrated them into the main specification as
proposal. I have also integrated the design decision FAQ I created because
several people indicated it was a useful document.
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/access-control/#requirements
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/access-control/#use-cases
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/access-control/#design-decision-faq
Feedback welcome!
Kind regards,
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: graycol.gif
- image/gif attachment: pic05664.gif
- image/gif attachment: ecblank.gif
Received on Friday, 18 January 2008 15:00:36 UTC