W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-appformats@w3.org > January 2008

Re: Access Control: integrated Requirements, Use Cases and FAQ

From: Jon Ferraiolo <jferrai@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 06:30:44 -0800
To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>, public-appformats-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFBADE9E3E.0DD2F725-ON882573D4.004EC77E-882573D4.004FB801@us.ibm.com>

I just want to go on record saying that I disagree with some of the
rationale in the FAQ section. I have already described my disagreements in:

* http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2008Jan/0169.html

There was follow-on discussion on some of my points, but bottom-line is the
same: I still disagree with some of the choices and the rationale behind
those choices. Despite my disagreements, however, if Access Control
finishes and gets adopted by industry, it will provide a set of benefits
and costs to the industry. My disagreements are more about how there could
be greater benefit and less cost if different choices were made.


             "Anne van                                                     
             <annevk@opera.com                                          To 
             >                         "WAF WG (public)"                   
             Sent by:                  <public-appformats@w3.org>          
             public-appformats                                          cc 
                                       Access Control: integrated          
             01/18/2008 03:32          Requirements, Use Cases and FAQ     


To help keep us on track I took the feedback we had on use cases and
requirements so far and integrated them into the main specification as
proposal. I have also integrated the design decision FAQ I created because

several people indicated it was a useful document.


Feedback welcome!

Kind regards,

Anne van Kesteren

(image/gif attachment: graycol.gif)

(image/gif attachment: pic05664.gif)

(image/gif attachment: ecblank.gif)

Received on Friday, 18 January 2008 15:00:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:56:21 UTC