W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > December 2000

xml-dist-app@w3.org from December 2000 by date

Sunday, 31 December 2000
- Happy New Year Rakesh Nanda
Friday, 29 December 2000
- Re: DR309 -- ongoing discussion Martin Gudgin
- DR305 -- ongoing discussion David Ezell
- DR309 -- ongoing discussion David Ezell
Wednesday, 27 December 2000
- Re: MSIE/Mac in P2P mode Rohit Khare
- Re: MSIE/Mac in P2P mode Susan Lesch
- MIME marking for SOAP and XP (was text/xml for SOAP (and XP) con sidered harmful) Andrew Layman
- application/something+xml (was text/xml for SOAP (and XP) conside red harmful) Andrew Layman
- MSIE/Mac in P2P mode Dave Winer
Tuesday, 26 December 2000
- RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Larry Masinter
- RE: New Scenario Octav Chipara
Monday, 25 December 2000
- RE: New Scenario Dick Brooks
- New Scenario Octav Chipara
Saturday, 23 December 2000
- RE: Proposed revised wording of 6.3 preamble Krishna Sankar
Friday, 22 December 2000
- RE: Proposed revised wording of 6.3 preamble Anderson, William L
- Re: Proposed revised wording of 6.3 preamble Martin Gudgin
- Re: [DS5] Request with transport level response Jeffrey Kay
- Re: Proposed revised wording of 6.3 preamble Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
- Re: Strawman: Abstract Model for XP David Ezell
- [xml-dist-app] <none> Stephane MBAYE
- DS8 marwan sabbouh
- DS5 marwan sabbouh
- DS2 marwan sabbouh
- DS1 marwan sabbouh
- Re: Strawman: Abstract Model for XP Jean-Jacques Moreau
- Rational behind rewording of sender and receiver Martin Gudgin
- Proposed revised wording for XP receiver Martin Gudgin
- Proposed revised wording for XP sender Martin Gudgin
- Proposed revised wording of 6.3 preamble Martin Gudgin
Thursday, 21 December 2000
- Re: [DS4] Remote Procedure Call (RPC) Paul Denning
- Re: [DS4] Remote Procedure Call (RPC) Paul Denning
- Sun position on SOAP and ebXML Anne Thomas Manes
- RE: [DS1] Fire-and-forget to single receiver Mark Needleman - DRA
- RE: [DS1] Fire-and-forget to single receiver Dick Brooks
- Re: [DS2] Fire-and-forget to multiple receivers Paul Denning
- Re: [DS1] Fire-and-forget to single receiver Paul Denning
- Re: Strawman: Abstract Model for XP David Ezell
- [DS15] Communication via an intermediary john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
- [DS10] Message header and payload encryption john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
- [DS14] Quality of service provision john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
- [DS16] Asynchronous messaging john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
- [DS9] Message data signature and encryption john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
- [DS12] Communication via heterogeneous transports john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
- [DS11] Communication via multiple intermediaries john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
- Re: [DS1] Fire-and-forget to single receiver Mark Needleman - DRA
- [DS8] Conversational message exchange john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
- [DS7] Third party intermediary john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
- [DS6] Request with encrypted payload john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
- [DS5] Request with transport level response john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
- [DS1] Fire-and-forget to single receiver john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
- [DS4] Remote Procedure Call (RPC) john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
- [DS3] Request-response john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
- [DS2] Fire-and-forget to multiple receivers john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
Wednesday, 20 December 2000
- example usage scenarios and use cases Paul Cotton
- RE: Comments on XML Protocol Reqs Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
- Re: SOAP spec.: HTTP binding John Wilson
- RE: use case [SAX-style XP handlers] Andy Neilson
- Comments on XML Protocol Reqs Martin J. Duerst
- Re: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful mmurata@trl.ibm.co.jp
Tuesday, 19 December 2000
- XML Protocol Requirements published as a W3C Working Draft Hugo Haas
- RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Andrew Layman
- use case [multiple, asynchronous response patterns] Mark A. Jones
- use case [communication libaries and application data] Mark A. Jones
- use case [thin clients and binary/application data] Mark A. Jones
- Re: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Mark Baker
- use case [SAX-style XP handlers] Mark A. Jones
- RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Andrew Layman
- RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
- RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Andrew Layman
- Re: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Mark Baker
- Re: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful mmurata@trl.ibm.co.jp
- RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful mmurata@trl.ibm.co.jp
- RE: SOAP spec.: HTTP binding Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Monday, 18 December 2000
- RE: SOAP spec.: HTTP binding Andy Neilson
- RE: SOAP spec.: HTTP binding Kevin Koch
- RE: SOAP spec.: HTTP binding Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
- SOAP spec.: HTTP binding Kevin Koch
- Re: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Mark Baker
- Dec 6 teleconference minutes Hugo Haas
- RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Saturday, 16 December 2000
- RE: [Fwd: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful] Dick Brooks
- RE: [Fwd: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful] James Snell
- RE: [Fwd: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful] Dick Brooks
- [xml-dist-app] <none> WEERASOORIA,Senaka
Friday, 15 December 2000
- RE: DR027: Audit trails Paul Denning
Thursday, 14 December 2000
- RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful mmurata@trl.ibm.co.jp
Wednesday, 13 December 2000
- RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Andrew Layman
- RE: DR027: Audit trails Krishna Sankar
- RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Mike Dierken
- RE: DR027: Audit trails Henry Lowe
- validating an xml file syed kabeer
- RE: Response to "On the use of HTTP as a Substrate for Other Prot oco ls" Hall, Randy E
- RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
- RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful mmurata@trl.ibm.co.jp
- Re: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful mmurata@trl.ibm.co.jp
- RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Oisin Hurley
- RE: DR046 -- Application Semantics and Security Oisin Hurley
- RE: DR125: Defining app layer semantics Oisin Hurley
- RE: DR051 and DR006: Identification of message Oisin Hurley
- RE: [R608] and digital signatures Oisin Hurley
- RE: DR027: Audit trails Oisin Hurley
- RE: DR065 Oisin Hurley
- RE: DR033: UI interactions Oisin Hurley
- RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Burdett, David
Tuesday, 12 December 2000
- An error in the example in section 5.4.1? Mario Maccarini
- RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Mark Baker - Ottawa Consumer and Embedded Div.
- RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Andrew Layman
- Re: Response to "On the use of HTTP as a Substrate for Other Protoco ls" Jeff.Hodges@kingsmountain.com
- RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Mike Dierken
- Re: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Mark Needleman - DRA
- RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
- RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Dick Brooks
- ebXML press release Dick Brooks
- Re: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Larry Cable
- RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Larry Masinter
- Re: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Larry Cable
- RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Larry Masinter
- text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful mmurata@trl.ibm.co.jp
Monday, 11 December 2000
- SOAP Messages with Attachments, W3C Submission David Fallside
- Re: Which 4 orgs can set de jure standards (was RE: SOAP and ebXML) christopher ferris
- Re: Which 4 orgs can set de jure standards (was RE: SOAP and ebXML) Henry Lowe
- Re: Which 4 orgs can set de jure standards (was RE: SOAP and ebXML) Mark Needleman - DRA
- Re: Which 4 orgs can set de jure standards (was RE: SOAP and ebXML) christopher ferris
- Re: Which 4 orgs can set de jure standards (was RE: SOAP and ebXML) Olivier DUBUISSON
- Re: Which 4 orgs can set de jure standards (was RE: SOAP and ebXML) christopher ferris
- Which 4 orgs can set de jure standards (was RE: SOAP and ebXML) Tolkin, Steve
Sunday, 10 December 2000
- CFP XML and Distributed Applications Fabio Arciniegas A.
Monday, 11 December 2000
- Re: Intermediaries and remote URI references (was: RE: [DR008] - pass ing arbitrary content) Mark Nottingham
- RE: Intermediaries and remote URI references (was: RE: [DR008] - pass ing arbitrary content) Satish Thatte
- RE: Intermediaries and remote URI references (was: RE: [DR008] - pass ing arbitrary content) Satish Thatte
- RE: Intermediaries and remote URI references (was: RE: [DR008] - pass ing arbitrary content) Burdett, David
Saturday, 9 December 2000
- Re: SOAP and ebXML Christopher Ferris
Sunday, 10 December 2000
- Re: Intermediaries and remote URI references (was: RE: [DR008] - pass ing arbitrary content) Mark Nottingham
- RE: Intermediaries and remote URI references (was: RE: [DR008] - pass ing arbitrary content) Satish Thatte
- Re: Intermediaries and remote URI references (was: RE: [DR008] - pass ing arbitrary content) Mark Nottingham
Saturday, 9 December 2000
- Intermediaries and remote URI references (was: RE: [DR008] - pass ing arbitrary content) Satish Thatte
- RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Dick Brooks
- f2f regrets mario.jeckle@daimlerchrysler.com
- Another real world use case from the DCOM list; requirement for async processing in XP Dick Brooks
- RE: SOAP and ebXML Dick Brooks
- Feedback from ebXML's TRP Vice Chair RE: SOAP and ebXML Dick Brooks
- RE: SOAP and ebXML Krishna Sankar
- RE: SOAP and ebXML Dick Brooks
Friday, 8 December 2000
- RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
- RE: SOAP and ebXML Nikola Stojanovic
- RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Andrew Layman
- RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Burdett, David
- [R300] References have changed Hugo Haas
- RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Paul Denning
- Re: SOAP and ebXML Ed Mooney
- Re: SOAP and ebXML David Clay
- RE: SOAP and ebXML Brian Eisenberg
- RE: SOAP and ebXML Satish Thatte
- RE: SOAP and ebXML Satish Thatte
- Typical use case to consider - FW: [SOAP] SQL Image File in SOAP message Dick Brooks
- RE: SOAP and ebXML Krishna Sankar
- Re: SOAP and ebXML Larry Cable
- RE: SOAP and ebXML john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
- RE: SOAP and ebXML Brian Eisenberg
- Redmond meeting directions john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
- RE: SOAP and ebXML Satish Thatte
- RE: SOAP and ebXML Satish Thatte
Thursday, 7 December 2000
- RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Henry Lowe
- Re: SOAP and ebXML Larry Cable
- RE: SOAP and ebXML Burdett, David
- RE: SOAP and ebXML Satish Thatte
- New draft of the requirements document available Hugo Haas
- RE: SOAP and ebXML Eric Newcomer
- use case for XP -- revalue smart card David Ezell
- [DR 008, 040] - Summary and proposal Kevin Mitchell
- RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content David E. Cleary
- RE: SOAP and ebXML David E. Cleary
- [DR609] feedback Randy Waldrop
- RE: SOAP and ebXML James Snell
- RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Dick Brooks
- RE: ebXML and XML Protocol Michael Brennan
- ebXML and XML Protocol Burdett, David
- RE: [DR304], [R502], [DR058], [DR025], [DR028], [DR067] and "mess age patterns" Mike Dierken
- RE: SOAP and ebXML Burdett, David
- SOAP and ebXML Michael Champion
Wednesday, 6 December 2000
- [DR304], [R502], [DR058], [DR025], [DR028], [DR067] and "message patterns" Frank DeRose
- [R608] and digital signatures Frank DeRose
- 15 & 29 Nov teleconference minutes Hugo Haas
- RE: DR046 -- Application Semantics and Security Alex Ceponkus
- RE: DR065 Alex Ceponkus
- Section 4.3: edited requirements (rev. 2) Jean-Jacques Moreau
- Re: DR065 Jean-Jacques Moreau
- Re: DR058: Interaction patterns Jean-Jacques Moreau
- Re: DR109: Resources/object references Jean-Jacques Moreau
- Re: DR051 and DR006: Identification of message Jean-Jacques Moreau
- Re: DR 122: Mapping issues Jean-Jacques Moreau
- Re: DR 122: Mapping issues Yves Lafon
- RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Oisin Hurley
- RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Mark A. Jones
- DR065 Alex Ceponkus
- DR124: Application Semantics Alex Ceponkus
- DR109: Resources/object references Alex Ceponkus
- DR058: Interaction patterns Alex Ceponkus
- DR033: UI interactions Alex Ceponkus
- DR125: Defining app layer semantics Alex Ceponkus
- DR027: Audit trails Alex Ceponkus
- DR051 and DR006: Identification of message Alex Ceponkus
- DR031: Routing Alex Ceponkus
- DR069 -- RPC and Application Semantics Alex Ceponkus
- DR046 -- Application Semantics and Security Alex Ceponkus
- RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
- RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
- RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Paul Denning
- Response to "On the use of HTTP as a Substrate for Other Protoco ls" Hall, Randy E
- RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
- RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content David E. Cleary
- RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content David E. Cleary
- What is the difference in using XML, Java applets and Html interms of Security and performance redae
- RE: DR 28: Multicast and R502 (fwd) Yves Lafon
- Re: [DR040] - Binary data Jean-Jacques Moreau
- Re: DR 28: Multicast and R502 Jean-Jacques Moreau
- Re: DR 122: Mapping issues Jean-Jacques Moreau
- Re: [DR040] - Binary data mario.jeckle@daimlerchrysler.com
- RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Dick Brooks
- RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Dick Brooks
- RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Andrew Layman
- RE: [DR 609] I18N experts' view Martin J. Duerst
Tuesday, 5 December 2000
- RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Mike Dierken
- RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Dick Brooks
- RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Oisin Hurley
- RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Oisin Hurley
- RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Oisin Hurley
- RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
- RE: DR 28: Multicast and R502 Frank DeRose
- RE: [DR040] - Binary data Kevin Mitchell
- RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Kevin Mitchell
- RE: [DR040] - Binary data Paul Denning
- RE: DR 121: Additional transport services Oisin Hurley
- Re: [DR 609] I18N experts' view Hugo Haas
- RE: [DR040] - Binary data Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
- RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Anderson, William L
- Re: DR 122: Mapping issues Henry Lowe
- Re: DR 122: Mapping issues Yves Lafon
- RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
- Re: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Jean-Jacques Moreau
- RE: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content David E. Cleary
- RE: [DR040] - Binary data David E. Cleary
- Re: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Kevin Mitchell
- Re: [DR120] Compact Encoding and Compression Issues Jean-Jacques Moreau
- Re: [DR040] - Binary data Jean-Jacques Moreau
- Re: [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Jean-Jacques Moreau
- Re: DR 121: Additional transport services Jean-Jacques Moreau
- Re: DR 22: raw TCP usage Jean-Jacques Moreau
- RE: [DR 609] I18N experts' view Oisin Hurley
- RE: [DR040] - Binary data Oisin Hurley
- RE: DR 121: Additional transport services Oisin Hurley
- RE: DR 123: HTTP-NG, out-of-order delivery Oisin Hurley
- RE: DR 22: raw TCP usage Oisin Hurley
- [DR 22, 25, 28, 122] Oisin Hurley
Monday, 4 December 2000
- [DR120] Compact Encoding and Compression Issues amr.f.yassin@philips.com
- [DR040] - Binary data Kevin Mitchell
- [DR008] - passing arbitrary content Kevin Mitchell
- Re: DR 122: Mapping issues Henry Lowe
- [DR119] Binary data Kevin Mitchell
- Re: DR 122: Mapping issues Jean-Jacques Moreau
- Re: [DR 609] I18N experts' view Martin J. Duerst
- Re: DR 122: Mapping issues Henry Lowe
Friday, 1 December 2000
- [DR 609] I18N experts' view Hugo Haas
- Re: [DR 309] Vague? David Ezell
- DR 121: Additional transport services Jean-Jacques Moreau
- DR 123: HTTP-NG, out-of-order delivery Jean-Jacques Moreau
- DR 122: Mapping issues Jean-Jacques Moreau
- DR 22: raw TCP usage Jean-Jacques Moreau
- DR 25: Multicast (again) Jean-Jacques Moreau
- DR 28: Multicast Jean-Jacques Moreau

Last message date: Sunday, 31 December 2000 07:18:00 GMT
Archived on: Monday, 16 March 2009 11:12:36 GMT