- From: David Clay <david.clay@oracle.com>
- Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 11:36:13 -0800
- To: john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
- CC: Satish Thatte <satisht@microsoft.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
I completely agree with your assesment. I think we should carefully look through our requirements doc to make sure that requirements for support of ebXML PTR (as we curently understand it) are included. Of particular interest in this regard is Appendix C of the ebXML PTR draft, which contrasts MIME with current SOAP as packaging technologies. Having said this, there is no reason why we should not critically review the ebXML specification and suggest improvements. john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com wrote: > . > > The technical community involved in both camps believe that convergence via > XP is a no-brainer. Let's make that happen, then any political posturing > will be just that. > > John > > XML Technology and Messaging, > IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park, > Winchester, SO21 2JN > > Tel: (work) +44 (0)1962 815188 (home) +44 (0)1722 781271 > Fax: +44 (0)1962 816898 > Notes Id: John Ibbotson/UK/IBM > email: john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
Received on Friday, 8 December 2000 14:33:52 UTC