Re: DR 122: Mapping issues

Henry Lowe wrote:

> The current text for DR 122 is given.  Then (in the proposal) it is
> suggested that this text for DR 122 is a dup(licate) of DR 122.
> Unless there is a typo here, I don't understand what is a duplicate
> of what.

Sorry, this was a typo. Thanks for spotting this.

Here's the correct text.

Proposal for DR 122
---------------------
Considering that we will NOT be looking at other mappings, I consider
this requirement as a dup of DR 121 [1], and so I propose that we drop it.

Jean-Jacques.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2000Dec/0002.html