W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > December 2000

RE: DR027: Audit trails

From: Paul Denning <pauld@mitre.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 16:13:57 -0500
Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.0.20001215160947.04b5d2a0@mailsrv1.mitre.org>
To: Henry Lowe <hlowe@omg.org>, "Oisin Hurley" <ohurley@iona.com>
Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-elliott-ldapext-spdna-recrecs-00.txt

Although the draft above is for logging and auditing of LDAP, many of the 
requirements are applicable to audit trails by XP Intermediaries.

Paul

At 10:40 AM 2000-12-13, Henry Lowe wrote:
>Audit trails are a requirement for many B2B applications
>and this is in ebXML.  Consolidation of duplicates is OK,
>but it shouldn't be dropped entirely.
>
>Best regards,
>Henry
>----------------
>At 05:57 AM 12/13/2000 +0000, Oisin Hurley wrote:
> >
> >> DR027: "There must be a way to deal with audit trails of the
> >> protocol flow."
> >>
> >> Duplicate of R807
> >> "Tracking - enabling message recipients to determine a message's path
> >> through preceding intermediates"
> >>
> >> Drop?
> >
> >The XML protocol specification is not a place to deal specifically with
> >protocol flow options - so I agree with the drop call.
> >
> >However it is possible, given the existence of intermediaries and their
> >recognition of first-class citizens in the message delivery, to perform
> >at least a basic form of auditing.
> >
> > --oh
> >
> >--
> >ohurley at iona dot com
> >+353 1 637 2639
> >
Received on Friday, 15 December 2000 16:15:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:58 GMT