Re: DR 122: Mapping issues

Yves Lafon wrote:

> Well, I like the wording of DR122 about the potential problems, so I'd
> rather keep 122 (or make a long 121 by collapsing the two).

I guess I was not clear enough. I am proposing: 1) to keep DR122 (but with the
newer wording); 2) to reword DR121 as follows (the additional text starts with
"unless"):

>      The XML Protocol WG recognizes that a number of XML messaging
>      proposals use protocols other than HTTP, for example SMTP or BEEP.
>      Although the WG encourages individuals and organisations to develop
>      such bindings for XP, it will only provide a binding for HTTP
>      initially
>      , unless enough interest is shown by WG members to develop other
>      bindings, and enough time is available for that work.

Jean-Jacques.

Received on Wednesday, 6 December 2000 16:59:39 UTC