W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > December 2000

RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful

From: Mike Dierken <mike@DataChannel.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 11:01:55 -0800
Message-ID: <8E864C73E16B864BB594712EDB3C89A0409CBA@belmail2.datachannel.com>
To: xml-dist-app@w3.org

So, 'foo/bar' identifies content that only some end application can
understand?

And, 'foo/bar+xml' identifies content that is an XML1.0 document and can be
parsed with an XML parser?

And 'text/xml' and 'application/xml' identifies content that is also XML and
could be parsed, but generally should not be parsed by 'intermediaries'?


Mike
Received on Tuesday, 12 December 2000 14:02:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:58 GMT