W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > December 2000

RE: [DS1] Fire-and-forget to single receiver

From: Mark Needleman - DRA <mneedlem@dra.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 13:20:59 -0600 (CST)
To: Dick Brooks <dick@8760.com>
cc: john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com, xml-dist-app@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.95.1001221132052.391B-100000@tourist.dra.com>
----- Message Text -----
Dick
 
so perhaps i got confused about the word transport in DS5 - DS1 and 2 are
no acks at the MHS level and 5 is? - maybe the wording can be made clearer
to indicate at what transport layer things are happening at?
 
mark


On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Dick Brooks wrote:

> Mark,
> 
> >I guess I have one comment about this and DS2 - in DS5 there is the
> >specific mention of a transport level ack - so does DS1 and DS2 explicitly
> >assume there is no ack to the msg at any level. It seems to me that
> >defining how lower layers on which XP may run behave is not really in
> >scope and I think we need to be clear that the lack of acknowledgment we
> >are talking about here is at the XP protocol level
> >
> >Trying to mandate how lower level protocol stacks behave seems a little
> >out of scope
> >Or is this really saying there is no ack at any level  - in which case I
> >need to understand why
> 
> ebXML defines a "Message Service Handler layer" (MSH) which provides a
> specific set of "message processing services" to upper layers. The MSH rides
> on top of application level transport mechanisms (HTTP, FTP, SMTP) which in
> turn ride on top of reliable network stacks (e.g. TCP/IP) which use TCP
> level "acks" to ensure reliable delivery.
> 
> The acks referenced in [DS5] are issued by a receiving MHS to indicate that
> a message service handler has successfully "accepted delivery of" a message
> (header+payload). DS1 and DS2 use cases do not require the MSH to
> acknowledge receiving a message, however reliable delivery is assumed in
> both DS1 and DS2 cases through the use of TCP/IP based protocols.
> 
> Dick Brooks
> http://www.8760.com/
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 21 December 2000 14:21:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:58 GMT