w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org from July to September 2001 by author

Amir Herzberg

• Signature overview - minor additional modifications (Monday, 3 September)
• RE: signature overview question/comment (Wednesday, 15 August)
• signature overview question/comment (Tuesday, 14 August)
• Another solution to Reference Properties (Sunday, 8 July)
• RE: DateTime (DT) attribute in Reference (Sunday, 8 July)
• DateTime (DT) attribute in Reference (Thursday, 5 July)

Ari Kermaier

• Re: Why is the Target attribute in SignatureProperty required? (Monday, 27 August)

b54yhn567@msn.com

• Join the fight to quality. Make 36 Annually secured (Thursday, 30 August)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

• Re: CDATA vs. EMPTY (Monday, 9 July)

Brian LaMacchia

• RE: Poll (Was: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform)) (Friday, 21 September)
• RE: DateTime (DT) attribute in Reference (Thursday, 5 July)

C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

• clarifications on XML Schema base64Binary type (Friday, 27 July)

Christian Geuer-Pollmann

• Re: Should we define a "critical" flag for ds:Object (Thursday, 27 September)
• Should we define a "critical" flag for ds:Object (Thursday, 27 September)
• RE: Purpose of CRL (Friday, 21 September)
• Purpose of CRL (Friday, 21 September)
• X509SubjectName and binary values (Thursday, 13 September)
• Re: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform) (Wednesday, 5 September)
• Re: Enveloped-signature games with pre-c14n (Tuesday, 4 September)
• Re: Enveloped-signature games with pre-c14n (Saturday, 1 September)
• Same-document reference (Monday, 27 August)
• Re: Enveloped-signature games with pre-c14n (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: Enveloped-signature games with pre-c14n (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: Enveloped-signature games with pre-c14n (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: Enveloped-signature games with pre-c14n (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: Enveloped-signature games with pre-c14n (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Enveloped-signature games with pre-c14n (Tuesday, 21 August)
• RE: XPath Expression (Thursday, 16 August)
• RE: XPath Expression (Thursday, 16 August)
• Typo in 6.6.3 XPath Filtering (Friday, 10 August)
• RE: Question: Base64 Transform Nodeset Input (Tuesday, 31 July)
• Question: Transform Nodeset Input (Tuesday, 31 July)
• Question: Base64 Transform Nodeset Input (Tuesday, 31 July)
• RE: Questions about c14n implementation (Monday, 30 July)
• Re: Questions about c14n implementation (Monday, 30 July)
• Questions about c14n implementation (Monday, 30 July)
• Re: What's a relative Namespace URI? (Wednesday, 25 July)
• What's a relative Namespace URI? (Wednesday, 25 July)
• Canonical XML implementation (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Suggested additions to 3.0 Processing Rules section (Thursday, 12 July)

David M. Balenson

• CFP: Submission deadline for NDSS'02 extended to Aug 29th (Friday, 17 August)

Donald E Eastlake 3rd

• Tweaked Section 6.4.1 (Tuesday, 7 August)

Donald E. Eastlake 3rd

• Re: Poll (Was: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform)) (Friday, 21 September)
• Re: Error in DSAKeyValue DTD/Schema (Wednesday, 29 August)
• Re: Why is the Target attribute in SignatureProperty required? (Monday, 27 August)
• Re: signature overview question/comment (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: Questions about c14n implementation (Monday, 30 July)
• Re: Suggested additions to 3.0 Processing Rules section (Friday, 27 July)
• Re: initial Exclusive Canonicalization draft (Friday, 27 July)
• Re: ID/DTD/c14n/dsig mischief? (Friday, 27 July)
• Re: C14N Argument (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: What's a relative Namespace URI? (Wednesday, 25 July)
• initial Exclusive Canonicalization draft (Monday, 9 July)
• Re: CDATA vs. EMPTY (Monday, 9 July)
• SPKIData.ANY (Sunday, 8 July)
• Re: Canonicalization of <SignedInfo> for Reference Validation (Saturday, 7 July)
• Re: DateTime (DT) attribute in Reference (Friday, 6 July)
• Re: DateTime (DT) attribute in Reference (Thursday, 5 July)
• Re: DateTime (DT) attribute in Reference (Thursday, 5 July)
• Re: Poll on Exclusive Canonicalization (Tuesday, 3 July)
• Re: comments on current xml dsig draft (Tuesday, 3 July)

Donald Eastlake

• Suggested additions to 3.0 Processing Rules section (Wednesday, 11 July)

Donald Eastlake 3rd

• Re: How to multi-sign? (Thursday, 23 August)

Dournaee, Blake

• Schema Validation Transform (Tuesday, 28 August)
• RE: Why is the Target attribute in SignatureProperty required? (Monday, 27 August)
• RE: signature overview question/comment (Tuesday, 14 August)
• RE: XPath Expression (Tuesday, 7 August)
• RE: Re: Re: XPath Expression (Thursday, 2 August)
• XPath Expression (Thursday, 2 August)
• RE: C14N Argument (Friday, 27 July)
• RE: C14N Argument (Friday, 27 July)
• RE: C14N Argument (Thursday, 26 July)
• RE: C14N Argument (Thursday, 26 July)
• RE: C14N Argument (Wednesday, 25 July)
• C14N Argument (Wednesday, 25 July)
• Section 4.3.3.2 (Monday, 9 July)
• RE: Canonicalization of <SignedInfo> for Reference Validation (Saturday, 7 July)
• RE: Canonicalization of <SignedInfo> for Reference Validation (Friday, 6 July)
• RE: Canonicalization of <SignedInfo> for Reference Validation (Thursday, 5 July)
• Canonicalization of <SignedInfo> for Reference Validation (Thursday, 5 July)
• comments on current xml dsig draft (Tuesday, 3 July)

edsimon@xmlsec.com

• Re: Poll (Was: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform)) (Friday, 21 September)
• "An Introduction to XML Digital Signatures" white paper on XML.com (Friday, 10 August)
• RE: Re: Re: XPath Expression (Thursday, 2 August)
• RE: Re: Re: XPath Expression (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Re: Re: XPath Expression (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Re: XPath Expression (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: XPath Expression (Thursday, 2 August)

Elliotte Rusty Harold

• Editorial problem in Section 4.2 of digital signature spec (Sunday, 15 July)

Eric van der Vlist

• Re: initial Exclusive Canonicalization draft (Thursday, 12 July)
• Re: initial Exclusive Canonicalization draft (Thursday, 12 July)
• ARe: initial Exclusive Canonicalization draft (Thursday, 12 July)
• Re: initial Exclusive Canonicalization draft (Thursday, 12 July)

Frederick Hirsch

• xml/digsig mime type? (Monday, 10 September)

Gregor Karlinger

• RE: Poll (Was: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform)) (Friday, 21 September)
• RE: Purpose of CRL (Friday, 21 September)
• RE: Purpose of CRL (Friday, 21 September)
• RE: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform) (Tuesday, 18 September)
• RE: FW: Base64 (Wednesday, 5 September)
• RE: FW: Base64 (Wednesday, 29 August)
• RE: FW: Base64 (Wednesday, 29 August)
• RE: FW: Base64 (Tuesday, 28 August)
• RE: W3C Proposed Recommendation: (Tuesday, 28 August)
• RE: Base64 (Thursday, 16 August)
• RE: Base64 (Monday, 6 August)
• RE: Re: Re: XPath Expression (Monday, 6 August)
• RE: Questions about c14n implementation (Monday, 6 August)
• RE: Questions about c14n implementation (Monday, 30 July)
• RE: initial Exclusive Canonicalization draft (Friday, 13 July)
• RE: Suggested additions to 3.0 Processing Rules section (Thursday, 12 July)
• RE: DateTime (DT) attribute in Reference (Thursday, 5 July)

Hallam-Baker, Phillip

• RE: X509 Schema Tweaks (Was: XML Signature schema implementation) (Thursday, 27 September)

Harada

• Fw: Re:Call for Review: XML Digital Signature is a W3C Proposed Recommendation (Tuesday, 18 September)

Henry S. Thompson

• Re: Schema Contributions to C14N (Was: Suggested additions to 3.0 Processing Rules section) (Wednesday, 5 September)
• Re: FW: Base64 (Tuesday, 4 September)

Internet-Drafts@ietf.org

• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-2-01.txt (Monday, 27 August)

Joan Arnedo

• Problem with indentation (Tuesday, 7 August)

joanna88y@yahoo.com

• Join the Middle Class Rich! (Monday, 30 July)

john

• How to multi-sign? (Thursday, 23 August)
• How to multi-sign? (Thursday, 23 August)

John Boyer

• RE: Re: Re: XPath Expression (Thursday, 2 August)
• RE: Re: Re: XPath Expression (Thursday, 2 August)
• RE: Re: Re: XPath Expression (Thursday, 2 August)
• RE: Re: Re: XPath Expression (Thursday, 2 August)
• RE: Question: Base64 Transform Nodeset Input (Tuesday, 31 July)
• RE: Question: Base64 Transform Nodeset Input (Tuesday, 31 July)
• RE: Section 4.3.3.2 (Friday, 27 July)
• RE: C14N Argument (Friday, 27 July)
• RE: C14N Argument (Thursday, 26 July)
• RE: C14N Argument (Wednesday, 25 July)
• RE: C14N Argument (Wednesday, 25 July)
• RE: ID/DTD/c14n/dsig mischief? (Thursday, 12 July)
• RE: initial Exclusive Canonicalization draft (Thursday, 12 July)
• RE: Canonicalization of <SignedInfo> for Reference Validation (Thursday, 5 July)

John Ross

• Comments requested on ETSI Draft TR "XML format for signature policies" (Thursday, 9 August)

Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

• Re: XPath Expression (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: XPath Expression (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: XPath Expression (Thursday, 2 August)
• Issues Closed and Moving Forward (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Exclusive C14N (Was: Minutes of 2001-07-30 Teleconf) (Monday, 30 July)
• Minutes of 2001-07-30 Teleconf (Monday, 30 July)
• Comment on Exclusive Canonicalization (Friday, 27 July)
• RE: Section 4.3.3.2 (Friday, 27 July)
• RE: C14N Argument (Friday, 27 July)
• Re: Section 4.3.3.2 (Friday, 27 July)
• Re: Suggested additions to 3.0 Processing Rules section (Friday, 27 July)
• RE: C14N Argument (Friday, 27 July)
• XSLT and Schema Processing Model within XMLDSIG (Wednesday, 25 July)
• Surreptitious Forwarding (Wednesday, 25 July)
• xmldsig Call 13:00 EST July 30 (Wednesday, 25 July)
• Python Canonical XML (Wednesday, 25 July)
• Re: Suggested additions to 3.0 Processing Rules section (Monday, 16 July)
• Re: initial Exclusive Canonicalization draft (Monday, 16 July)
• Re: Editorial problem in Section 4.2 of digital signature spec (Monday, 16 July)
• Re: Schema Contributions to C14N (Was: Suggested additions to 3.0 Processing Rules section) (Thursday, 12 July)
• Schema Contributions to C14N (Was: Suggested additions to 3.0 Processing Rules section) (Thursday, 12 July)
• Re: initial Exclusive Canonicalization draft (Thursday, 12 July)
• Re: initial Exclusive Canonicalization draft (Wednesday, 11 July)
• RE: Canonicalization of <SignedInfo> for Reference Validation (Monday, 9 July)
• Re: SPKIData.ANY (Monday, 9 July)
• RE: Canonicalization of <SignedInfo> for Reference Validation (Friday, 6 July)
• Re: Canonicalization of <SignedInfo> for Reference Validation (Thursday, 5 July)
• Describing Objects (Was: DateTime (DT) attribute in Reference) (Thursday, 5 July)
• Reference Validation of Same Document URIs (Tuesday, 3 July)
• Re: comments on current xml dsig draft (Tuesday, 3 July)

Joseph Reagle

• Removal of XML/Schema Validation Transforms (Friday, 28 September)
• Tweak to Schema (Friday, 28 September)
• Re: Poll (Was: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform)) (Thursday, 27 September)
• X509 Schema Tweaks (Was: XML Signature schema implementation) (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: Should we define a "critical" flag for ds:Object (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: Poll (Was: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform)) (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: Poll (Was: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform)) (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Clarification on 4.4.4 (Tuesday, 25 September)
• Re: XML Signature schema implementation (Thursday, 20 September)
• Poll (Was: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform)) (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform) (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: Fw: Re:Call for Review: XML Digital Signature is a W3C Proposed Recommendation (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform) (Friday, 14 September)
• Re: X509SubjectName and binary values (Friday, 14 September)
• Re: latest draft xmldsig (Wednesday, 12 September)
• Re: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform) (Wednesday, 12 September)
• Re: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform) (Wednesday, 12 September)
• Re: xml/digsig mime type? (Monday, 10 September)
• Re: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform) (Monday, 10 September)
• Comment from PR Review: Is XML1.0 parsing well-formed or validating? (Thursday, 6 September)
• Encoding whitespace in DNAME (Was: W3C Proposed Recommendation:) (Wednesday, 5 September)
• Re: Responses to two Character Model last call issues (Wednesday, 5 September)
• Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform) (Tuesday, 4 September)
• Re: FW: Base64 (Tuesday, 4 September)
• Re: Enveloped-signature games with pre-c14n (Tuesday, 4 September)
• Re: Enveloped-signature games with pre-c14n (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation: (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation: (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: FW: Base64 (Wednesday, 29 August)
• Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation: (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: FW: Base64 (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: Schema Validation Transform (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Error in DSAKeyValue DTD/Schema (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: Same-document reference (Monday, 27 August)
• Re: Why is the Target attribute in SignatureProperty required? (Monday, 27 August)
• Re: signature overview question/comment (Thursday, 23 August)
• W3C Proposed Recommendation: (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: Base64 (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: XPath Expression (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Problem with indentation (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Tweaked Section 6.4.1 (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Interruptions of Service (Thursday, 9 August)
• Quick question on XSLT transform (Thursday, 9 August)

Juan Carlos Cruellas

• Publication of Draft ETSI TS "XML Advanced Electronic Signatures" for public comment: CORRECT LINK: STF178Task3Draft.pdf (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Publication of Draft ETSI TS on XML Advanced Electronic Signatures for public comment (Tuesday, 24 July)

Karl Scheibelhofer

• RE: FW: Base64 (Wednesday, 29 August)
• RE: Why is the Target attribute in SignatureProperty required? (Tuesday, 28 August)
• RE: Why is the Target attribute in SignatureProperty required? (Monday, 27 August)
• Why is the Target attribute in SignatureProperty required? (Monday, 27 August)

KOBZAR,IGOR (HP-Cupertino,ex1)

• RE: Poll on Exclusive Canonicalization (Tuesday, 3 July)

Manoj K. Srivastava

• XML Digital Signature Demo and Library (Friday, 28 September)

Martin Duerst

• Responses to two Character Model last call issues (Wednesday, 29 August)

Mary_Ellen_Zurko@iris.com

• WWW2002 CFP (Friday, 28 September)

merlin

• Re: Poll (Was: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform)) (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: X509SubjectName and binary values (Thursday, 13 September)
• Re: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform) (Wednesday, 12 September)
• Re: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform) (Tuesday, 11 September)
• Re: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform) (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform) (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: Enveloped-signature games with pre-c14n (Monday, 3 September)
• Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation: (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation: (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation: (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation: (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: FW: Base64 (Wednesday, 29 August)
• Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation: (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation: (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: Enveloped-signature games with pre-c14n (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: Enveloped-signature games with pre-c14n (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: Enveloped-signature games with pre-c14n (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: Enveloped-signature games with pre-c14n (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: Base64 (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: Re: Re: XPath Expression (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Re: XPath Expression (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Minutes of 2001-07-30 Teleconf (Tuesday, 31 July)
• Re: C14N Argument (Saturday, 28 July)
• Re: C14N Argument (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: initial Exclusive Canonicalization draft (Sunday, 15 July)
• Re: initial Exclusive Canonicalization draft (Thursday, 12 July)
• Re: Suggested additions to 3.0 Processing Rules section (Thursday, 12 July)
• Re: initial Exclusive Canonicalization draft (Wednesday, 11 July)
• Re: initial Exclusive Canonicalization draft (Wednesday, 11 July)
• Re: DateTime (DT) attribute in Reference (Thursday, 5 July)
• Re: DateTime (DT) attribute in Reference (Thursday, 5 July)
• Re: DateTime (DT) attribute in Reference (Thursday, 5 July)

Peter Tornberg

• Re: X509 Schema Tweaks (Was: XML Signature schema implementation) (Friday, 28 September)
• Re: XML Signature schema implementation (Friday, 21 September)
• XML Signature schema implementation (Thursday, 20 September)

Rich Salz

• Clarification on 4.4.4 (Monday, 24 September)

Susan Lesch

• Comments for PR-xmldsig-core-20010820 (Monday, 3 September)

Suszczewski Mateusz

• xfdl and xfa (Thursday, 12 July)

The IESG

• Note Well (Tuesday, 17 July)
• Note Well (Tuesday, 17 July)

Thomas Maslen

• Re: ID/DTD/c14n/dsig mischief? (Friday, 13 July)
• ID/DTD/c14n/dsig mischief? (Thursday, 12 July)

Tom Gindin

• Re: XML Signature schema implementation (Friday, 21 September)
• Re: a typo in section 6.4.1 ? (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Editorial problem in Section 4.2 of digital signature spec (Monday, 16 July)
• Re: DateTime (DT) attribute in Reference (Friday, 6 July)

Tommy Tse

• Re : Graphic Card Offer From Manufacturer (Sunday, 10 September)

ZOHAR,ILAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)

• a typo in section 6.4.1 ? (Thursday, 2 August)
• RE: Canonicalization of <SignedInfo> for Reference Validation (Friday, 6 July)

杉山　高弘

• Re: Poll (Was: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform)) (Friday, 21 September)

Last message date: Friday, 28 September 2001 16:29:25 UTC