On Thursday 30 August 2001 12:30, merlin wrote: > It basically seems to me that support for a single schema child goes only > half way. I am probably wrong, but the two meaningful options seem, > to me, either not to support any explicit schema child, or to support > multiple children. Very Irish of me, I know. Can you give me the specific scenario not addressable by what is presently specified? I know it can be awkward (if one schema imports other schema that exists in seperate files) but I think they be can be referenced via URIs and I wasn't keen to spend lots of time on another schema dependency that could get fairly complex.Received on Thursday, 30 August 2001 13:14:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:14 GMT