W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > July to September 2001

RE: Question: Base64 Transform Nodeset Input

From: John Boyer <JBoyer@PureEdge.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 11:16:16 -0700
Message-ID: <7874BFCCD289A645B5CE3935769F0B52196394@tigger.PureEdge.com>
To: "Christian Geuer-Pollmann" <geuer-pollmann@nue.et-inf.uni-siegen.de>, <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>

<jb>
Hi Christian,
</jb>

Yes, I know that the <comment> Element is not an XML Element 

<jb>Actually, <comment> is an element, which is why its text descendant
gets added to the string result.</jb>

The problem resulted in my understanding of what is an XPath 
node set and how I convert an input stream to a node set which is valid 
input for the transforms. Given a Document like:

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- Comment 1 -->
<doc>Hello, world!<!-- Comment 2 --></doc>

Q: Does the xpath node set contain 2 nodes (the comment 1 and the <doc> 
element) or does it contain 4 nodes (both comments, the <doc> element
and 
the text node?

<jb>An XPath node-set is capable of containing every node of the
document.  A node-set could contain just the two nodes or it could
contain all four nodes (both comments, <doc>, the text node).  In either
case, it also contains a special 'root' node as parent to <doc>.  The
root node is not an element, but it is needed to provide a single point
of entry to the parse tree.  The root node in your example above has two
children:  <doc> and Comment 1.

If you want c14n to write the whole document in your example above, then
the node-set has to include all of the nodes.  If you only included
<doc> and the 'Comment 1' node, then the c14n output would be:

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- Comment 1 -->
<doc></doc>

Regards,
John Boyer
Senior Product Architect, Software Development
Internet Commerce System (ICS) Team
PureEdge Solutions Inc. 
Trusted Digital Relationships
v: 250-708-8047  f: 250-708-8010
1-888-517-2675   http://www.PureEdge.com <http://www.pureedge.com/>  	
 	
</jb>

Christian

> The inserted <comment> element (which is not an XML comment, but
rather
> an XML element like any other) would cause a problem for base-64
> decoding.  The behavior to mimic is XPath string(), which
concatenates
> all descendant text nodes.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christian Geuer-Pollmann
> [mailto:geuer-pollmann@nue.et-inf.uni-siegen.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 5:55 AM
> To: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
> Subject: Question: Base64 Transform Nodeset Input
>
>
> What does section "6.6.2 Base64" mean whan it states:
>
> "If an XPath node-set (or sufficiently functional alternative) is
given
> as
> input, then it is converted to an octet stream by performing
operations
> logically equivalent to 1) applying an XPath transform with expression
> self::text(), then 2) taking the string-value of the node-set."
>
> Is the following fragment valid input which decodes to "The URI of the
> transform is http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#base64"
>
> <BASE64>
> VGhlIFVSSSBvZiB0aGUgdHJhbn<comment>Inserting this comment should not
> change
> anything for processing</comment>
> Nmb3JtIGlzIGh0dHA6Ly93d3cudzMub3JnLzIwMDAvMDkveG1s
> ZHNpZyNiYXNlNjQ=
> </BASE64>
Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2001 14:16:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:13 GMT