Hi Joseph, Here goes; schema validation transform example; untried, untested, etc. Merlin r/reagle@w3.org/2001.09.04/15:06:45 >On Monday 27 August 2001 20:21, Dournaee, Blake wrote: >> I see no qualifier (RQUIRED, RECOMMENDED, OPTIONAL) for the schema >> validation transform that is mentioned in the latest PR for XML Dsig. What >> is the status of this? Did I just miss it? > >We can call it optional if we can get interop on an example of this as an >explicit transform. Anyone want to send an example to the list? > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Baltimore Technologies plc will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any virus being passed on. In addition, certain Marketing collateral may be added from time to time to promote Baltimore Technologies products, services, Global e-Security or appearance at trade shows and conferences. This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by Baltimore MIMEsweeper for Content Security threats, including computer viruses. http://www.baltimore.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:14 GMT