r/reagle@w3.org/2001.08.28/16:41:55 >On Tuesday 28 August 2001 05:39, merlin wrote: >> 6.6.6 (always fortuitous to see) Schema Validation >> You have some text relating to XSLT at the end of the first paragraph. > >Ah, right, should say "schema child". Fixed. Speaking of which, is a single schema child sufficient? If we are to support explicit schema in any form, then we really need to support several; a document may involve multiple namespaces with a corresponding multiplicity of schemata. Or does schema support this in some manner? Merlin ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Baltimore Technologies plc will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any virus being passed on. In addition, certain Marketing collateral may be added from time to time to promote Baltimore Technologies products, services, Global e-Security or appearance at trade shows and conferences. This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by Baltimore MIMEsweeper for Content Security threats, including computer viruses. http://www.baltimore.comReceived on Thursday, 30 August 2001 10:58:23 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:14 GMT