- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 13:29:27 -0400
- To: "Tom Gindin" <tgindin@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>, dee3@torque.pothole.com, dsolo@alum.mit.edu, w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
At 23:58 7/15/2001, Tom Gindin wrote: > This may not be perfectly stated, but its intent is not that obscure. >A better way of putting it might be: "While we specify two SignatureMethod >algorithms, one mandatory and one optional to implement, user specified >algorithms may be used as SignatureMethod algorithms instead." http://www.w3.org/Signature/Drafts/xmldsig-core/Overview.html $Revision: 1.94 $ on $Date: 2001/07/16 17:28:08 $ /+While we identify two SignatureMethod algorithms, one mandatory and one optional to implement, user specified algorithms may be used as well.+/ -- Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Monday, 16 July 2001 13:29:33 UTC