- From: merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 16:16:43 +0100
- To: "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org>
- Cc: "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
r/reagle@w3.org/2001.07.30/14:31:25 >http://www.w3.org/Signature/Minutes/010730-tele.html >ACTION Hughes: post data on performance of canonicalization versus parsing, >and >Canonical XML and Exclusive Canonicalization as presently specified. (Reagle: >we might be barking up the wrong tree, might not be able to make it that much >faster.) Algorith \ Document size | 1.5KB | 18KB | 902KB ------------------------------------------------- non-validated parsing | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 c14n | .44 | 0.52 | 0.84 exclusive c14n | .48 | 0.69 | 1.58 reaglonicalization | .36 | 0.42 | 0.82 Times down a column are measured relative to the parsing time; times across a row are independent; the large documents were quite repetitious. All the values are, of course, meaningless, except to possibly conclude that Reaglonicalization may be an acceptable substitute for Exclusive Canonicalization that fits Joseph's desired parameters (no slower than regular c14n). Merlin ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Baltimore Technologies plc will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any virus being passed on. In addition, certain Marketing collateral may be added from time to time to promote Baltimore Technologies products, services, Global e-Security or appearance at trade shows and conferences. This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by Baltimore MIMEsweeper for Content Security threats, including computer viruses. http://www.baltimore.com
Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2001 11:17:29 UTC