Thinking again on Merlin's note... He suggested adding a ReferenceProperties element within Object, thereby not requiring change in the spec. But, I believe we can place the Object tag only in the main Signature element, which makes the linkage between it and the reference itself quite obscure; also, since we obviously need to _sign_ the date/time (or other reference property), this requires to also sign the Object, which makes it even more complex. If we could have Object in Reference also, as a general extension mechanism, it would mostly solve the problem (except it would leave the time non-standardized - I think time is such an important element of many signatures that we should have standardized way to specify it). So I still prefer us to agree on a simple DT attribute to Reference. But allowing Object under Reference would be almost as good. Best regards, Amir Herzberg CTO, NewGenPay Inc. http://www.newgenpay.com/Amir/Herzberg.htm SMS (urgent only!): _subject_ of email to aherzberg@walla.co.ilReceived on Sunday, 8 July 2001 03:24:10 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:13 GMT