W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > July to September 2001

Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation:

From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 12:03:07 -0400
To: merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie>
Cc: "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20010830160307.D369187360@policy.w3.org>
On Thursday 30 August 2001 10:57, merlin wrote:
> Speaking of which, is a single schema child sufficient?
> If we are to support explicit schema in any form, then
> we really need to support several; a document may involve
> multiple namespaces with a corresponding multiplicity of
> schemata. Or does schema support this in some manner?

That's what that sentence is *supposed* to answer [1]. If you want to do 
multiple validations, use multiple transforms. If the schema have complex 
relationships between them, build your relationship with includes imports and 
the like.

... the ordered application of multiple schema validations may require 
multiple Transforms.... 
No special provision is made for the identification of a remote stylesheet at 
a given URI because it can be communicated via an xsd:include or xsd:import 
within the schema child of the Transform.
Received on Thursday, 30 August 2001 12:04:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:21:36 UTC