W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > July to September 2001

Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation:

From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 12:03:07 -0400
To: merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie>
Cc: "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20010830160307.D369187360@policy.w3.org>
On Thursday 30 August 2001 10:57, merlin wrote:
> Speaking of which, is a single schema child sufficient?
> If we are to support explicit schema in any form, then
> we really need to support several; a document may involve
> multiple namespaces with a corresponding multiplicity of
> schemata. Or does schema support this in some manner?

That's what that sentence is *supposed* to answer [1]. If you want to do 
multiple validations, use multiple transforms. If the schema have complex 
relationships between them, build your relationship with includes imports and 
the like.

[1] 
http://www.w3.org/Signature/Drafts/xmldsig-core/Overview.html#sec-SchemaValidation
... the ordered application of multiple schema validations may require 
multiple Transforms.... 
No special provision is made for the identification of a remote stylesheet at 
a given URI because it can be communicated via an xsd:include or xsd:import 
within the schema child of the Transform.
Received on Thursday, 30 August 2001 12:04:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:21:36 UTC