- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 18:54:45 -0400
- To: merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie>
- Cc: "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
At 07:58 7/12/2001, merlin wrote:
>The encoding (and, incidentally, your algorithm URI) belongs in &more;
If I understand you, I don't agree with this. This specification should
define its own identifier. Why would it exist in &more;?
Regardless, I'm of where it's specified, I believe the list needs to be
specfied in one of the following ways:
<Transform Algorithm="&exc-c14n">foo,bar</Transform>
Unless we decide it's encoded as part of the identifier:
<Transform Algorithm="&exc-c14n?unsupressed=foo,bar">
--
Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature
W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Thursday, 12 July 2001 18:54:49 UTC