At 07:58 7/12/2001, merlin wrote: >The encoding (and, incidentally, your algorithm URI) belongs in &more; If I understand you, I don't agree with this. This specification should define its own identifier. Why would it exist in &more;? Regardless, I'm of where it's specified, I believe the list needs to be specfied in one of the following ways: <Transform Algorithm="&exc-c14n">foo,bar</Transform> Unless we decide it's encoded as part of the identifier: <Transform Algorithm="&exc-c14n?unsupressed=foo,bar"> -- Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/Received on Thursday, 12 July 2001 18:54:49 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:13 GMT