Hello All, There is something that I have been pondering about XML Signatures. Specifically, the current Candidate Rec allows for the use of Canonical XML as a transform in the "transformation pipeline" above and beyond the use of C14N to convert any node-set to octets. Consider this Argument: 1. If a Reference is to be processed as "XML" (node-set), it will be canonicalized implicitly when the node-set is converted to octets at the end of the transformation pipeline. 2. If a Reference is to be processed as octets, canonicalization is meaningless, since we don't know what the file format is anyhow 3. C14N, when used as a part of the transformation pipeline is redundant. Is there some exception to my argument here? What is missing? Kind Regards, Blake Dournaee Toolkit Applications Engineer RSA Security "The only thing I know is that I know nothing" - SocratesReceived on Wednesday, 25 July 2001 16:47:29 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:13 GMT